LINGUIST List 22.562 Wed Feb 02 2011 TOC: Theoretical Linguistics 36/2-3 (2010) Editor for this issue: Justin Petro <justinlinguistlist.org> Directory         1.     Julia Ulrich , Theoretical Linguistics Vol. 36, No. 2-3 (2010) Message 1: Theoretical Linguistics Vol. 36, No. 2-3 (2010) Date: 31-Jan-2011 From: Julia Ulrich <julia.ulrichdegruyter.com> Subject: Theoretical Linguistics Vol. 36, No. 2-3 (2010) E-mail this message to a friend Publisher: De Gruyter Mouton http://www.degruyter.com/mouton Journal Title: Theoretical Linguistics Volume Number: 36 Issue Number: 2-3 Issue Date: 2010 Main Text: Theoretical Linguistics Volume: 36, Number: 2-3 (December 2010) The above issue is now available online at: http://www.reference-global.com/toc/thli/2010/36/2-3?ai=12h&ui=w6&af=H Referential CPs and DPs: An operator movement account Liliane Haegeman and Barbara Ürögdi Comments Event operator movement in Factives: Some facts from Gungbe Enoch O. Aboh Exploring embedded main clause phenomena: The irrelevance of factivity and some challenges from V2 languages Kristine Bentzen Comments on “Referential CPs and DPs: An operator movement account” Rajesh Bhatt On the intervention account of main clause phenomena restrictions: NPI licensing and EV2 Carlos de Cuba Complement types and the CP/DP parallelism: A case of Japanese Ken Hiraiwa Belief will create fact: On the relation between givenness and presupposition, and other remarks Dalina Kallulli Review of “Referential CPs and DPs: An operator movement account” by Liliane Haegeman and Barbara Ürögdi Iliyana Krapova On event operator movement in English factives Anikó Lipták Reply Operator movement, referentiality and intervention Liliane Haegeman and Barbara Ürögdi Linguistic Field(s): Syntax                             Linguistic Theories                             Philosophy of Language Subject Language(s): English (eng)                             Éwé (ewe) Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue Page Updated: 02-Feb-2011       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.