LINGUIST List 22.70 Wed Jan 05 2011 TOC: Narrative Inquiry 20/2 (2010) Editor for this issue: Justin Petro <justinlinguistlist.org> Directory         1.     Paul Peranteau , Narrative Inquiry Vol. 20, No. 2 (2010) Message 1: Narrative Inquiry Vol. 20, No. 2 (2010) Date: 04-Jan-2011 From: Paul Peranteau <paulbenjamins.com> Subject: Narrative Inquiry Vol. 20, No. 2 (2010) E-mail this message to a friend Publisher: John Benjamins http://www.benjamins.com/ Journal Title: Narrative Inquiry Volume Number: 20 Issue Number: 2 Issue Date: 2010 Main Text: Narrative Inquiry 20:2 2010. iv, 174 pp. Table of contents Articles Romance and irony, personal and academic: How mothers of children with autism defend goodness and express hope Carrie Birmingham 225–245 Narrating traumas and transgressions: Links between narrative processing, wisdom, and well-being Cade D. Mansfield, Kate C. Mclean and Jennifer P. Lilgendahl 246–273 Big stories co-constructed: Incorporating micro-analytical interpretative procedures into biographic research Sarah Helsig 274–295 Stabilizing violence: Structural complexity and moral transparency in penalty phase narratives Sara Cobb 296–324 Tales of the bitter and sweet: A study of a Taiwanese master story and transgression narratives as shared cross-generationally in Taiwanese families Todd L. Sandel 325–348 Narrative inquiry for school-based research Shijing Xu and Michael Connelly 349–370 Commentary papers Why and why not? Narrative approaches in the social sciences Betsy Rymes 371–374 Over-stating claims for story and for narrative inquiry: A cautionary note Mary M. Juzwik 375–380 Still desperately seeking identity: Narrative inquiry for schools Diane R. Wood 381–386 Another turn to narrative practice Jaber F. Gubrium 387–391 The practice of narrative Donald E. Polkinghorne 392–396 Linguistic Field(s): Ling & Literature Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue Page Updated: 05-Jan-2011       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.