LINGUIST List 22.91
|
Thu Jan 06 2011
TOC: Terminology 16/2 (2010)
Editor for this issue: Justin Petro
<justin linguistlist.org>
|
Directory
1. Paul Peranteau ,
Terminology Vol. 16, No. 2 (2010)
Message 1: Terminology Vol. 16, No. 2 (2010)
|
Date: 04-Jan-2011
From: Paul Peranteau <paul benjamins.com>
Subject: Terminology Vol. 16, No. 2 (2010)
E-mail this message to a friend
Publisher: John Benjamins
http://www.benjamins.com/
Journal Title: Terminology
Volume Number: 16
Issue Number: 2
Issue Date: 2010
Main Text:
Terminology 16:2 2010. ca. 150 pp. Table of contents Articles Bilingual term recognition revisited: The bag-of-equivalents term alignment approach and its evaluation Spela Vintar 141–158 Terminology evolution and legal development: A case study of Chinese legal terminology Shifeng Ni, Le Cheng and King Kui Sin 159–180 Analysing the status of borrowed morphemes in terminological structure: The case of Japanese terminologies Kyo Kageura 181–216 Book reviews Navarro, Carmen, Ma Rosa Rodríguez Abella, Francesca Dalle Pezze and Renzo Miotti (eds.). 2008. La comunicación especializada Reviewed by Álvaro Echeverri 217–223 Humbley, John (ed.). 2009. Terminologie: orientations actuelles Reviewed by Juan C. Sager 224–229 Edo Marzá, Nuria. 2009. The Specialised Lexicographical Approach: A Step further in Dictionary-making Reviewed by Janine Pimentel 230–234 Nielsen, Sandro and Sven Tarp (eds.). 2009. Lexicography in the 21st Century. In Honour of Henning Bergenholtz. Reviewed by Loránd-Levente Pálfi 235–241 Schryver, Gilles-Maurice de (ed.). 2010. A Way with Words: Recent Advances in Lexical Theory and Analysis, A Festschrift for Patrick Hanks Reviewed by Henri Béjoint 242–247 Publications received 249 Call for papers 251–253 Contents of Volume 16 255–256
Linguistic Field(s):
Translation
Subject Language(s): Chinese, Mandarin (cmn)
Japanese (jpn)
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Page Updated: 06-Jan-2011
|
|
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|