* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 23.108

Thu Jan 05 2012

Calls: Historical Linguistics/UK

Editor for this issue: Alison Zaharee <alisonlinguistlist.org>


New! Multi-tree Visit LL's Multitree project for over 1000 trees dynamically generated from scholarly hypotheses about language relationships:
            http://multitree.linguistlist.org/

LINGUIST is pleased to announce the launch of an exciting new feature: Easy Abstracts! Easy Abs is a free abstract submission and review facility designed to help conference organizers and reviewers accept and process abstracts online. Just go to: http://www.linguistlist.org/confcustom, and begin your conference customization process today! With Easy Abstracts, submission and review will be as easy as 1-2-3!
Directory
        1.     Muriel Norde , Pragmaticalization at NRG5


Message 1: Pragmaticalization at NRG5
Date: 04-Jan-2012
From: Muriel Norde <m.norderug.nl>
Subject: Pragmaticalization at NRG5
E-mail this message to a friend

Full Title: Pragmaticalization at NRG5

Date: 16-Jul-2012 - 19-Jul-2012
Location: Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Contact Person: Muriel Norde
Meeting Email: < click here to access email >
Web Site: http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/nrg5/Home.html

Linguistic Field(s): Historical Linguistics

Call Deadline: 17-Jan-2012

Meeting Description:

The development of discourse markers is a controversial issue in grammaticalization theorizing (Beijering fc.). On the one hand, the growth of discourse markers is characterized by changes and effects typically attested in grammaticalization, e.g. decategorialization, phonological reduction, divergence or layering. On the other hand, it is crucially different from grammaticalization (Brinton & Traugott 2005:138f.), for instance because it involves scope increase instead of scope reduction, and an increase in syntactic freedom instead of syntactic fixation. These differences and similarities with prototypical cases of grammaticalization have given rise to divergent conceptualizations of the rise of discourse markers. Some authors (e.g. Ocampo 2006, Norde 2009) define pragmaticalization a process distinct from grammaticalization, others (e.g. Wischer 2000) consider it a special subtype of grammaticalization, yet others redefine grammaticalization properties so as to be able to include discourse makers. For example, Diewald (2011: 368) extends the notion of (grammatical) obligatoriness to 'communicative obligatoriness'.

References:

Beijering, Karin. fc. Expressions of epistemic modality in Mainland Scandinavian: A study into the lexicalization-grammmaticalization-pragmaticalization interface. PhD thesis, University of Groningen.
Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Diewald, Gabriele. 2011. Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics 49(2), 365-390.
Norde, Muriel. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ocampo, Francisco. 2006. Movement towards discourse is not grammaticalization: the evolution of claro from adjective to discourse particle in spoken Spanish. In Sagarra, Nuria & Almeida Jacqueline Toribio (eds) Selected proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, 308-319. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Wischer, Ilse. 2000. Grammaticalization versus lexicalization. 'Methinks' there is some confusion. In Fischer, Olga, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds) Pathways of change. Grammaticalization in English, 355-370. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Call for Papers:

This is a call for papers for a workshop proposal to be submitted to the New Reflections on Grammaticalization 5 conference, to be held at the University of Edinburgh, July 16-19, 2012.

In this workshop, we welcome both theoretically and empirically oriented papers that address the question of whether pragmaticalization is a composite change in its own right, besides (de)lexicalization and (de)grammaticalization. Although we consider the boundaries between these 'izations' as gradient, we are keen to explore the specific properties that distinguish discourse markers from grammatical elements such as prepositions or modal auxiliaries, both synchronically and diachronically.

Abstracts should be submitted directly to the NRG5 website (http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/nrg5/Call_For_Papers.html) and marked for 'Workshop on Pragmaticalization'. Please send your abstract to the two of us as well, so we can include it in our workshop proposal. Also, if you already submitted your abstract to the conference website but would like to join our workshop, please forward your abstract to us and we will inform the conference organizers.

Important notice: The general deadline for abstract submission to NRG5 is January 10, but has been extended to January 17 for just this workshop. If our workshop proposal is rejected, your abstract will still be reviewed for the general programme.

Convenors:

Karin Beijering (k.beijeringrug.nl), University of Groningen
Muriel Norde (m.norderug.nl), University of Groningen



Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue



Page Updated: 05-Jan-2012

Supported in part by the National Science Foundation       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       ILIT Logo
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.