LINGUIST List 23.1116
|
Tue Mar 06 2012
Qs: Suppletion Cross-linguistically
Editor for this issue: Zac Smith
<zac linguistlist.org>
|
New! Visit LL's Multitree project for over 1000 trees dynamically generated from scholarly hypotheses about language relationships: http://multitree.linguistlist.org/
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate. In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.cfm.
|
Date: 04-Mar-2012
From: Piers Kelly <Piers.Kelly anu.edu.au>
Subject: Suppletion Cross-linguistically
E-mail this message to a friend
Hi Linguists, I'm working on a Philippine auxiliary language that has bucketloads of suppleted forms. In other words, I'm dealing with words where the morphology is not explicit, as in English 'go' -> 'went' and Russian. I would like to know if you can tell me of other languages that have a high degree of this kind of implicit morphology. And is there a way of quantifying suppletion in a language? Many thanks, Piers
Linguistic Field(s):
Typology
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Page Updated: 06-Mar-2012
|
|
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|