LINGUIST List 23.1331
|
Thu Mar 15 2012
TOC: Reading and Writing 25/3 (2012)
Editor for this issue: Justin Petro
<justin linguistlist.org>
|
Date: 15-Mar-2012
From: Jolanda Voogd <Jolanda.Voogd springer.com>
Subject: Reading and Writing Vol. 25, No. 3 (2012)
E-mail this message to a friend
Publisher: Springer
http://www.springer.com
Journal Title: Reading and Writing
Volume Number: 25
Issue Number: 3
Issue Date: 2012
Main Text:
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-010-9291-6 Title: Evaluating the effectiveness of a phonologically based reading intervention for struggling readers with varying language profiles Author(s): Fiona J. Duff, Marianna E. Hayiou-Thomas and Charles Hulme pages: 621-640 DOI: 10.1007/s11145-010-9292-5 Title: Word processing programs and weaker writers/readers: a meta-analysis of research findings Author(s): Paul Morphy and Steve Graham pages: 641-678 DOI: 10.1007/s11145-010-9293-4 Title: Syntactic skills in sentence reading comprehension among Chinese elementary school children Author(s): Pakey Pui-man Chik, Connie Suk-han Ho, Pui-sze Yeung, David Wai-ock Chan, Kevin Kien-hoa Chung, Hui Luan, Lap-yan Lo and Wendy Suet-yee Lau pages: 679-699 DOI: 10.1007/s11145-011-9296-9 Title: Reading a note, reading a mind: children’s notating skills and understanding of mind Author(s): Diana Leyva, Sarah Hopson and Ashley Nichols pages: 701-716 DOI: 10.1007/s11145-011-9297-8 Title: Reading motivation and reading comprehension in Chinese and English among bilingual students Author(s): Dan Lin, Ka Ki Wong and Catherine McBride-Chang pages: 717-737 DOI: 10.1007/s11145-011-9298-7 Title: Reading the graphics: what is the relationship between graphical reading processes and student comprehension? Author(s): Rebecca R. Norman pages: 739-774
Linguistic Field(s):
Applied Linguistics
Cognitive Science
Language Acquisition
Phonology
Syntax
Subject Language(s): Chinese, Mandarin (cmn)
English (eng)
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Page Updated: 15-Mar-2012
|
|
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|