LINGUIST List 23.1390|
Mon Mar 19 2012
Qs: Government in Autosegmental-Metrical Phonology
Editor for this issue: Zac Smith
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.cfm.
From: Theodore Stern <sterntheogmail.com>
Subject: Government in Autosegmental-Metrical Phonology
E-mail this message to a friend
In starting the preparations for a PhD research proposal, I have been
thinking over the possibilities of combining these two different
theoretical approaches in a unified account of stress assignment.
My ideas are still in the very early stages - I am thinking of what it might
look like to allow, say, nuclei to license association of starred tones (T*)
to other nuclei; I am only starting now to think of what this might look
I am enquiring as to whether any one familiar with one or the other
theoretical frameworks (or both) has any comments (especially doubts)
concerning the compatability of one theory with the other. Also, if there
is existing literature which explicitly or implicitly touches on the subject
that anyone is aware of, I would be quite grateful for references. I am
definately aware of certain government phonology approaches to
stress assignment, stress licensing and floating CV stress; but I am
curious as to whether anyone has ever gone as far enough to say
(something like) a nucleus licensing association of an autosegment to a
tier containing H*-L for example.
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Page Updated: 19-Mar-2012
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.