LINGUIST List 23.1408
|
Tue Mar 20 2012
Diss: Historical Ling/Semantics/Syntax/Sanskrit: Lowe: 'The Syntax and Semantics of Tense-Aspect Stem Participles in Early Rgvedic Sanskrit'
Editor for this issue: Xiyan Wang
<xiyan linguistlist.org>
|
New! Visit LL's Multitree project for over 1000 trees dynamically generated from scholarly hypotheses about language relationships: http://multitree.linguistlist.org/
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.cfm.
|
Date: 20-Mar-2012
From: John Lowe <johnjlowe gmail.com>
Subject: The Syntax and Semantics of Tense-Aspect Stem Participles in Early Rgvedic Sanskrit
E-mail this message to a friend
Institution: University of Oxford
Program: D.Phil. in Linguistics
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2012
Author: John Jeffrey Lowe
Dissertation Title: The Syntax and Semantics of Tense-Aspect Stem Participles in Early Rgvedic Sanskrit
Linguistic Field(s):
Historical Linguistics
Semantics
Syntax
Subject Language(s): Sanskrit (san)
Language Family(ies): Indo-European
Dissertation Director:
Elizabeth Tucker
Andreas Willi
Dissertation Abstract:
In this thesis I investigate the syntax and semantics of tense-aspect stem participles in the Rgveda, focusing primarily on the data from the earlier books II-VII and IX, seeking to establish a comprehensive and coherent analysis of this category within the linguistic system of Rgvedic Sanskrit. In recent literature tense-aspect stem participles are usually treated as semantically equivalent to finite verbs wherever possible, but contradictorily where they differ from finite verbs their adjectival nature is emphasized. I argue that tense-aspect stem participles are a fundamentally verbal formation and can be treated as inflectional verb forms: they are adjectival verbs rather than verbal adjectives. At the same time, however, they constitute an independent sub-category of verb form which is not necessarily semantically dependent on corresponding finite stems. I examine the syntactic and semantic properties of tense-aspect stem participles both in relation to finite verbal forms and their wider syntactic context, formalizing the evidence in the framework of Lexical-Functional Grammar. Consequently I am able to categorize the syntactic and semantic deviations which many participles exhibit in comparison to finite verbal forms. I contend that many such forms cannot be treated synchronically (and sometimes diachronically) as participles, but form distinct synchronic categories. My analysis permits a considerably more refined definition of the category of tense-aspect stem participles, dependent on clear morphological, syntactic and semantic criteria, as opposed to the usual, purely morphological, definition. From a diachronic perspective I argue that the category of tense-aspect stem participles as found in the Rgveda more closely reflects an inherited Proto Indo-European category of tense-aspect stem participles than is usually assumed. I also reconsider theoretical treatments of participial syntax and semantics, and develop a more precise typology of non-finite verb systems which adequately accounts for Sanskrit participles.
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Page Updated: 20-Mar-2012
|
|
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|