LINGUIST List 23.1449
|
Wed Mar 21 2012
Qs: Women only Languages
Editor for this issue: Zac Smith
<zac linguistlist.org>
|
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate. In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.cfm.
|
Date: 21-Mar-2012
From: Paula Isvoranu <paula_isvoranu yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: Women only Languages
E-mail this message to a friend
Dear colleagues, My name is Paula Isvoranu and I have freshly begun graduate work in sociolinguistics (genderlect, to be more precise). Currently I am researching instances in which the difference between sexes is the most pronounced, leading to a separate “women only” language, or at least to specific markers that are exclusively used by females. So far, I have found a couple of such examples: Nu Shu, Yanyuwa, and Laadan (for completely separate languages), and Japanese (for very marked gender differences in speech). I would be most grateful if you could point me in the direction of other societies/languages in which the gender differences are extremely marked linguistically. Yours, Paula Isvoranu
Linguistic Field(s):
Sociolinguistics
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Page Updated: 21-Mar-2012
|
|
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|