LINGUIST List 23.1539
|
Tue Mar 27 2012
TOC: Journal of Argumentation in Context 1/1 (2012)
Editor for this issue: Justin Petro
<justin linguistlist.org>
|
Date: 27-Mar-2012
From: Paul Peranteau <paul benjamins.com>
Subject: Journal of Argumentation in Context Vol. 1, No. 1 (2012)
E-mail this message to a friend
Publisher: John Benjamins
http://www.benjamins.com/
Journal Title: Journal of Argumentation in Context
Volume Number: 1
Issue Number: 1
Issue Date: 2012
Subtitle: Argumentation and Health
Main Text:
2012. vi, 142 pp. Table of Contents Argumentation in the healthcare domain Sara Rubinelli and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans 1–4 Argumentation and informed consent in the doctor–patient relationship Jerome Bickenbach 5–18 Institutional constraints on strategic maneuvering in shared medical decision-making A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans and Dima Mohammed 19–32 Reasonableness of a doctor’s argument by authority: A pragma-dialectical analysis of the specific soundness conditions Roosmaryn Pilgram 33–50 Evaluating argumentative moves in medical consultations Sarah Bigi 51–65 Teaching argumentation theory to doctors: Why and what Sara Rubinelli and Claudia Zanini 66–80 Direct-to-consumer advertisements for prescription drugs as an argumentative activity type Renske Wierda and Jacky Visser 81–96 The strategic function of variants of pragmatic argumentation in health brochures Lotte van Poppel 97–112 Argumentation and risk communication about genetic testing: Challenges for healthcare consumers and implications for computer systems Nancy L. Green 113–129 “It is about our body, our own body!”: On the difficulty of telling dutch women under 50 that mammography is not for them Peter J. Schulz and Bert Meuffels 130–142
Linguistic Field(s):
Discourse Analysis
Pragmatics
Sociolinguistics
Subject Language(s): Dutch (nld)
Italian (ita)
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Page Updated: 27-Mar-2012
|
|
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|