LINGUIST List 23.1828
|
Tue Apr 10 2012
TOC: Journal of Language & Politics 11/1 (2012)
Editor for this issue: Justin Petro
<justin linguistlist.org>
|
Date: 10-Apr-2012
From: Paul Peranteau <paul benjamins.com>
Subject: Journal of Language & Politics Vol. 11, No. 1 (2012)
E-mail this message to a friend
Publisher: John Benjamins
http://www.benjamins.com/
Journal Title: Journal of Language & Politics
Volume Number: 11
Issue Number: 1
Issue Date: 2012
Main Text:
2012. iv, 167 pp. Table of Contents Argumentation and fallacy in newspaper op / ed coverage of the prelude to the invasion of Iraq John Wilson, Ahmed Sahlane and Ian Somerville 1–30 Critique and argumentation: On the relation between the discourse-historical approach and pragma-dialectics Bernhard Forchtner and Ana Tominc 31–50 The changing discourses on antisemitism in the UK press from 1993 to 2009: A modern-diachronic corpus-assisted discourse study Alan Partington 51–76 A reading in moral literacy or love story in the shadow of the Holocaust: Difference in translation Jenny Williams and Geoff Wilkes 77–92 Understanding contemporary Chinese political communication: A historico-intercultural analysis and assessment of its discourse of human rights Shi-xu 93–114 Fixing meaning: The many voices of the post-liberal hegemony in Russia Johannes Angermüller 115–134 Heresthetics in ballot proposition arguments: An investigation of California citizen initiative rhetoric Chad Murphy, Curt Burgess, Martin Johnson and Shaun Bowler 135–156 Piotr Cap (2008). Legitimisation in political discourse: A cross-disciplinary perspective on the modern US war rhetoric (2nd edn.) Reviewed by Patricia L. Dunmire 157–161 Cornelia Ilie (ed.) (2010). European Parliaments under Scrutiny. Reviewed by Liudmila Mikalayeva 162-167
Linguistic Field(s):
Discourse Analysis
Philosophy of Language
Sociolinguistics
Text/Corpus Linguistics
Translation
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Page Updated: 10-Apr-2012
|
|
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|