LINGUIST List 23.1829
|
Tue Apr 10 2012
TOC: Historiographica Linguistica 39/1 (2012)
Editor for this issue: Justin Petro
<justin linguistlist.org>
|
Date: 10-Apr-2012
From: Paul Peranteau <paulbenjamins.com>
Subject: Historiographica Linguistica Vol. 39, No. 1 (2012)
 E-mail this message to a friend
Publisher: John Benjamins
http://www.benjamins.com/
Journal Title: Historiographica Linguistica
Volume Number: 39
Issue Number: 1
Issue Date: 2012
Subtitle: Robert Lowth (1710-1787): The making of his grammar and its influence
Main Text:
2012. vi, 183 pp.
Table of Contents
Robert Lowth as a Codifier of the English Language: An introduction
Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade
1–8
Robert Lowth and the Critics: Literary contexts for the “Critical Notes” in his
Short Introduction to English Grammar (1762)
Carol Percy
9–26
Lowth’s Legacy in Teaching English to Foreigners: The case of Thomas Connelly’s
English grammar in Spain
Maria E. Rodríguez-Gil
27–42
‘Lowthian’ Linguistics across the North Sea
Gijsbert Rutten
43–60
“My imperfect attempt towards an English Grammar”: Lowth’s indebtedness to James
Harris in revising his grammar
Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade
61–75
Lowth and ‘Perfect Time’: The periphrastic have-perfect in 18th-century English
grammars
Jim Walker
77–92
Heinrich Christoph Albrecht’s Versuch einer critischen Englischen Sprachlehre :
Tracing Robert Lowth in an 18th-century textbook for the teaching and learning
of English
Göran Wolf
93–106
Lowth Holdings in Winchester College
Geoffrey Day and Suzanne Foster
107–114
De la grammatisation à la linguistique générale: Un parcours d’histoire et
d’épistémologie
Lia Formigari
115–122
La Gramática castellana d’Antonio de Nebrija: Grammaire d’une langue, langue
d’une grammaire. Tome I: Un système descriptif pour le castillan. Tome II: Index
lemmatisés. By René Pellen and Francis Tollis. Limoges
Reviewed by Lola Pons Rodríguez
123–128
The Language of the Sangleys: A Chinese vernacular in missionary sources of the
seventeenth century
Reviewed by W. South Coblin
129–133
“Moedertalen en taalmoeders”: Het vroegmoderne taalvergelijkende onderzoek in de
Lage Landen. By Toon Van Hal. (= Verhandelingen van de Koninklijke Vlaamse
Academie van België voor Wetenschappen en Kunsten, nieuwe reeks, 20.)
Reviewed by Kees Dekker
134–138
Francis Lodwick, On Language, Theology, and Utopia. Edited by Felicity Henderson
and William Poole
Reviewed by Nicholas McDowell
139–142
The Bellum Grammaticale and the Rise of European Literature. By Erik Butler
Reviewed by Tuomo Fonsén
143–147
Lietuvių kalbos ekspertai Rusijos imperijos tarnyboje: Dmitrijus Kaširinas,
Zacharijus Liackis, Andrius Poidėnas [The experts of Lithuanian in the service
of the Russian empire: Dmitrii Kashirin, Zacharijus Liackis and Andrius
Poidėnas]. By Giedrius Subačius
Reviewed by William R. Schmalstieg
148–152
Kolonialzeitliche Sprachforschung. Herausgegeben von Thomas Stolz, Christina
Vossmann und Barbara Dewein
Reviewed by Anne Storch
153–158
Ferdinand de Saussure zur Einführung. Von Ludwig Jäger
Reviewed by Peter Wunderli
159–167
Philosophy of Language and Other Matters in the Work of Anton Marty: Analysis
and Translations. Von Robin D. Rollinger. (= Studien zur österreichischen
Philosophie, 42.)
Reviewed by Clemens Knobloch
168–172
Strukturalismus in Deutschland: Literatur- und Sprachwissenschaft 1910–1975.
Herausgegeben von Hans-Harald Müller, Marcel Lepper und Andreas Gardt. (=
Marbacher Schriften, Neue Folge, 5.)
Reviewed by Jörn Albrecht
173–178
Der Wille zur Relevanz. Die Sprachforschung und ihre Förderung durch die DFG
1920–1970. Von Klaas-Hinrich Ehlers. (= Studien zur Geschichte der Deutschen
Forschungsgemeinschaft, 6.)
Reviewed by Andreas Gardt
179-183
Linguistic Field(s):
Historical Linguistics
History of Linguistics
Ling & Literature
Subject Language(s): Chinese, Mandarin (cmn)
English (eng)
Lithuanian (lit)
Spanish (spa)
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Page Updated: 10-Apr-2012
|
|
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|
