LINGUIST List 23.190
|
Tue Jan 10 2012
TOC: Russian Linguistics 35/3 (2011)
Editor for this issue: Justin Petro
<justin linguistlist.org>
|
Directory
1. Jolanda Voogd ,
Russian Linguistics Vol. 35, No. 3 (2011)
Message 1: Russian Linguistics Vol. 35, No. 3 (2011)
|
Date: 10-Jan-2012
From: Jolanda Voogd <Jolanda.Voogd springer.com>
Subject: Russian Linguistics Vol. 35, No. 3 (2011)
E-mail this message to a friend
Publisher: Springer
http://www.springer.com
Journal Title: Russian Linguistics
Volume Number: 35
Issue Number: 3
Issue Date: 2011
Main Text:
DOI: 10.1007/s11185-011-9081-z Title: Genitive vs. dative: the case of protivu in the history of Russian Родительный против дательного: вопрос о противу в истории русского языка Author(s): Elena Bratishenko pages: 283-299 DOI: 10.1007/s11185-011-9082-y Title: Infinitive clauses and dative subjects in Russian Инфинитивные предложения и дативный субъект в русском языке Author(s): Nerea Madariaga pages: 301-329 DOI: 10.1007/s11185-011-9078-7 Title: Linguistic russification in the Russian Empire: peasants into Russians? Языковая руссификация в Российской империи: cтали ли крестьяне русскими? Author(s): Aneta Pavlenko pages: 331-350 DOI: 10.1007/s11185-011-9079-6Open Access Title: Sociolinguistic variation in Novgorod birchbark documents: the case of no. 907 and other letters Социолингвистическое варьирование в новгородских грамотах на бересте: № 907 и другие письма Author(s): Jos Schaeken pages: 351-359 DOI: 10.1007/s11185-011-9080-0 Title: Корпус древнерусских списков Паренесиса Ефрема Сирина. III, 1: БАН 31.7.2 The corpus of the Old Russian copies of the Paraenesis of Ephraem Syrus. III, 1: BAN 31.7.2 Author(s): Oleg Zholobov pages: 361-380
Linguistic Field(s):
Historical Linguistics
Sociolinguistics
Syntax
Subject Language(s): German (deu)
Polish (pol)
Russian (rus)
Russian, Old (orv)
Tatar (tat)
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Page Updated: 10-Jan-2012
|
|
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|