LINGUIST List 23.2485
|
Fri May 25 2012
Confs: Computational Ling, Morphology, Psycholing, Text/Corpus Ling/New Zealand
Editor for this issue: Xiyan Wang
<xiyan linguistlist.org>
|
LINGUIST is pleased to announce an exciting service: Easy Abstracts! Easy Abs is a free abstract submission and review facility designed to help conference organizers and reviewers accept and process abstracts online. Just go to: http://www.linguistlist.org/confcustom, and begin your conference customization process today! With Easy Abstracts, submission and review will be as easy as 1-2-3!
|
Date: 25-May-2012
From: Ingo Plag <plaganglistik.uni-siegen.de>
Subject: Data-Rich Approaches to English Morphology
 E-mail this message to a friend
Data-Rich Approaches to English Morphology
Short Title: DRAEM
Date: 04-Jul-2012 - 06-Jul-2012
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Contact: Laurie Bauer
Contact Email: < click here to access email >
Meeting URL: http://www2.uni-siegen.de/~engspra/draem/
Linguistic Field(s): Computational Linguistics; Morphology; Psycholinguistics; Text/Corpus Linguistics
Subject Language(s): English
Meeting Description:
Data-Rich Approaches to English Morphology:
From Corpora and Experiments to Theory and Back
Recent work on English morphology has shown that morphological theory as well as the understanding of the morphological systems of particular languages can profit immensely from the study of large data sets that have become available through corpora and experiments. The aim of this conference is to bring together researchers that entertain data-rich approaches to English morphology to advance our understanding of this language and of morphological structure in general.
Invited Speakers:
Adam Albright
Akiko Nagano
Christina Gagné
Emmanuel Keuleers
Ingo Plag
Laurie Bauer
Melanie Bell
Rochelle Lieber
Victor Kuperman
Wednesday, July 4, 2012
9.20
Opening
9.30
Christina L. Gagné & Thomas L. Spalding, University of Alberta
Conceptual productivity: The role of relational meaning construction in the comprehension of novel and established noun compounds
10.15
Melanie Bell & Sabine Arndt-Lappe, Anglia Ruskin University & Universität Siegen
English compound stress in an analogical model of word formation
11.00
Break
11.30
Tutorial
Adam Albright, MIT
The Minimal Generalization Learner
12.15
Lunch
14.00
Elizaveta Tarasova, Victoria University of Wellington
Position-bound and /or relation-bound? The productivity of nouns as constituents of compounds.
14.45
Victor Kuperman, McMaster University
Spelling of English noun-noun compounds and its implications for word production and recognition
15.30
Break
16.00
Emmanuel Keuleers, Ghent University
From data-driven linguists to data-driven models: Some issues in building computational models of inflectional morphology
Thursday, July 5, 2012
9.30
Natalia Beliaeva, Victoria University of Wellington
The power of slanguage: Conceptual integration on the word formation level
10.15
Sabine Arndt-Lappe & Ingo Plag, Universität Siegen
Phonological variability in English blends
11.00
Break
11.30
Tutorial
Emmanuel Keuleers, Ghent University
Memory-based Learning
Free afternoon (Excursion)
Friday, July 6, 2012
9.30
Rochelle Lieber, University of New Hampshire
The case of the missing nominalization: an exploration of how far data-rich approaches can take us
10.15
Laurie Bauer, Victoria University of Wellington
Grammaticality, acceptability and the notion of possible word
11.00
Break
11.30
Tutorial
Victor Kuperman, McMaster University
Eye-tracking in morphological research
14.00
Adam Albright, MIT
Measuring the unobservable: quantifying paradigm gaps and morphological retreat
14.45
Akiko Nagano, University of Tsukuba
Doing morphology with the OED: A data-rich approach to English affixation
15.30
Break
16.00
Jen Hay, University of Canterbury
Spoken Morphology: Investigating the implementation of plural /s/ in a large corpus of historical New Zealand English
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Page Updated: 25-May-2012
|
|
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|
