* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 23.2518

Tue May 29 2012

TOC: Working Papers in Linguistics 16 (2012)

Editor for this issue: Justin Petro <justinlinguistlist.org>

Date: 28-May-2012
From: Craig Sailor <cwsailorucla.edu>
Subject: Working Papers in Linguistics Vol. 16 (2012)
E-mail this message to a friend

Publisher: UCLA Linguistics
http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/faciliti/wpl/index.htm

Journal Title: Working Papers in Linguistics
Volume Number: 16
Issue Number:
Issue Date: 2012


Subtitle: Papers in Semantics


Main Text:

UCLA Linguistics presents Vol. 16 of UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics

http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/faciliti/wpl/issues/wpl16/wpl16.html

Contents:

Denis Paperno Note from the Editor i-ii

Heather Burnett The Puzzle(s) of Absolute Adjectives. On Vagueness, Comparison,
and the Origin of Scale Structure 1-50

Ashley Feinsinger
The Semantic Lexicon and Analyticity
51-68

Ivan Kapitonov
Dynamic Pragmatics of too
69-93

Edward L. Keenan
In situ Interpretation without Type Mismatches
94-110

Denis Paperno
Comitative Coordination in Q'anjob'al
111-130

Jessica Rett
On Modal Subjectivity
131-150

Jacopo Torregrossa
Towards a Taxonomy of Focus Types. The Case of Information Foci and Contrastive
Foci in Italian
151-172


Linguistic Field(s): Pragmatics
                            Semantics
                            Typology

Subject Language(s): English (eng)
                            Hungarian (hun)
                            Italian (ita)
                            Q'anjob'al (kjb)
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue



Page Updated: 29-May-2012
Supported in part by the National Science Foundation       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       ILIT Logo
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.