LINGUIST List 23.3124
|
Thu Jul 19 2012
TOC: Review of Cognitive Linguistics 10/1 (2012)
Editor for this issue: Justin Petro
<justin linguistlist.org>
|
Date: 18-Jul-2012
From: Karin Plijnaar <karin benjamins.nl>
Subject: Review of Cognitive Linguistics Vol. 10, No. 1 (2012)
E-mail this message to a friend
Publisher: John Benjamins
http://www.benjamins.com/
Journal Title: Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Volume Number: 10
Issue Number: 1
Issue Date: 2012
Subtitle: Review of Cognitive Linguistics Vol. 10, No. 1 (2012)
Main Text:
2012. iv, 239 pp.
Table of Contents
Articles Optimizing the analysis of metaphor in discourse: How to make the most of qualitative software and find a good research design Michael Kimmel 1–48
Throwing results: A corpus-based account of four Spanish verbs Emma Skallman 49–89
The role of sound-symbolic forms in Motion event descriptions: The case of Japanese Kiyoko Toratani 90–132
Acquiring verbs in Spanish: An evaluation of two proposals Elisabet Serrat, Mònica Sanz-Torrent, Sara Feijóo, Silvia Maria Chireac and Joseph Hilferty 133–155
Metaphor-metonymies of joy and happiness in Greek: Towards an interdisciplinary perspective Maria Theodoropoulou 156–183
The situated common-sense knowledge in FunGramKB Carlos Periñán-Pascual 184–214
Interview with Antonio Barcelona Joseph Hilferty 215–226
Book reviews Benczes, Reka, Antonio Barcelona & Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.). (2011). Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a Consensus View. Reviewed by Olga Isabel Díez Velasco 227–232
Tabakowska, Elżbieta, Michał Choiński and Łukasz Wiraszka (Eds.). (2010). Cognitive Linguistics in Action. From Theory to Application and Back. Reviewed by Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano 233–239
Linguistic Field(s):
Cognitive Science
Computational Linguistics
Language Acquisition
Pragmatics
Semantics
Text/Corpus Linguistics
Subject Language(s): Greek, Modern (ell)
Japanese (jpn)
Spanish (spa)
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Page Updated: 19-Jul-2012
|
|
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|