LINGUIST List 23.3254
|
Wed Aug 01 2012
Diss: Phonology/ Semantics/ Syntax: Vlachos: 'Wh-constructions and the division...'
Editor for this issue: Lili Xia
<lxia linguistlist.org>
|
Date: 01-Aug-2012
From: Christos Vlachos <christos.vlachos gmail.com>
Subject: Wh-constructions and the division of labour between syntax and the interfaces
E-mail this message to a friend
Institution: University of Patras
Program: Department of Philology
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2012
Author: Christos Vlachos
Dissertation Title: Wh-constructions and the division of labour between syntax and the interfaces
Linguistic Field(s):
Phonology
Semantics
Syntax
Dissertation Director:
Elena Anagnostopoulou
Anna Roussou
Ianthi-Maria Tsimpli
Dissertation Abstract:
The minimalist approach to natural human language argues that the syntax of a language L maps a certain structure to a certain 'form' (pi) at PF and to a certain 'meaning' (lambda) at LF. With the above in mind, the ideal perhaps scenario, in terms of transparency, would be that the mapping between form and meaning would be one to one (1:1); in other words, there is as much form as there is meaning. This would further imply that the mapping between form and meaning is symmetric. The present thesis studies some aspects of the form and meaning of two kinds of wh-constructions in Modern Greek, i.e., questions and sluicing, and shows that the relevant mapping may not necessarily be 1:1. With respect to questions, it is argued that the same form may correspond to more than one meaning. As regards sluicing, it is proposed that there is less form than meaning. On the face of the previous, the argument will be as follows. Syntax generates form, and restricts part of meaning, while additional aspects of meaning are facilitated by PF (regarding wh-questions) and LF (concerning sluicing). Finally, since PF contributes to meaning, LF 'sees' PF, and vice versa.
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Page Updated: 01-Aug-2012
|
|
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|