* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 23.388

Mon Jan 23 2012

Calls: Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Theories, Typology/France

Editor for this issue: Alison Zaharee <alisonlinguistlist.org>

New! Multi-tree Visit LL's Multitree project for over 1000 trees dynamically generated from scholarly hypotheses about language relationships:

LINGUIST is pleased to announce the launch of an exciting new feature: Easy Abstracts! Easy Abs is a free abstract submission and review facility designed to help conference organizers and reviewers accept and process abstracts online. Just go to: http://www.linguistlist.org/confcustom, and begin your conference customization process today! With Easy Abstracts, submission and review will be as easy as 1-2-3!
        1.     Thierry Ruchot , Non-Canonical Predicative Relations

Message 1: Non-Canonical Predicative Relations
Date: 23-Jan-2012
From: Thierry Ruchot <atypic.criscounicaen.fr>
Subject: Non-Canonical Predicative Relations
E-mail this message to a friend

Full Title: Non-Canonical Predicative Relations

Date: 08-Nov-2012 - 10-Nov-2012
Location: Caen (Lower Normandy), France
Contact Person: Thierry Ruchot
Meeting Email: < click here to access email >

Linguistic Field(s): Linguistic Theories; Semantics; Syntax; Typology

Call Deadline: 30-Apr-2012

Meeting Description:

Co-organised by linguistics research centers CRISCO (Caen University) and CONTRAGRAM (Ghent University)

The canonicity of argument-predicate relations is at the heart of syntactic theories. The predictive power of models of predicate-argument relations is what this conference aims to re-evaluate in the light of non-canonical predicative realizations. Such realizations can be illustrated by the following attested sequences, which are unexpected given the verbal predicates.

He was suicided. (Web example)

A 100% positive mind-set [...] creates you a better individual. (Web example)

When a visitor passes through the village, young lamas stop picking up trash to mug for the camera. A gruff 'police monk' barks them back to work. (Newsweek 10/13/97) (See Michaelis 2005)

The definition, identification and interpretation of non-canonical predicative relations are at stake. How are we to define the non-canonical? This could be approached by characterizing what a prototypical predicative relation is. Which factors, structural, statistical or otherwise, do guide the recognition of non-canonical predicative relations? These relations would be expected to impact on language variation and change and inform on the limits of grammaticality. How is the interpretation of relevant cases dealt with? What is the respective role of general factors such as analogy and language-specific computation in this? What communicative dimensions justify and motivate non-canonical realizations?

Non-canonical predicative relations comprise argument reduction, demotion and extension, quirky argument marking and unexpected realizations (oblique subject and object marking, multiple realizations of the same argument). The papers will situate themselves with respect to existing analytical frameworks, and to the demands of compositionality, computationality and learnability. Issues of learnability and computationality are raised by approaches that posit as many different lexical items as there are constructions in which a verb enters. This may be addressed through correlations with aspectual categories, argumental hierarchies, or by valency-changing rules, which may operate in the lexicon or in syntax. Another approach is to relate underspecified verbal semantics to different constructional patterns. Whether these mechanisms meet the challenges of compositionality remains to be demonstrated.

Organized jointly by the linguistics research centers of University of Caen and University of Ghent, the meeting aims to stimulate international research collaborations in frontier research, and therefore to encourage exchanges across languages and theoretical boundaries. The languages of the meeting will be French and English.

Call for Papers:

We invite two-page abstracts spelling-out the research question, the language(s) studied and the data used, the explanation put forward, and the significance for current debates. Proposals should indicate whether they are amenable to poster format. Submissions should be made via EasyChair no later than April 30, 2012. In order to submit a contribution, please connect to https://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=atypic2012 where all necessary information will be provided.

Information on the conference will be found on the CRISCO web page at:


The selected contributions are to provide a robust empirical coverage of non-canonical predicative configurations that illuminates the treatment of predicate-argument relations in general.

Notification of decisions: June 30, 2012

Organising Committee: Liliane Docquiert (Caen), Dominique Legallois (Caen), Thierry Ruchot (chair, Caen), Miriam Taverniers (Ghent), Marleen Van Peteghem (Ghent), Pascale van Praet (Caen)

Scientific Committee: Jóhanna Barddal (Bergen), Jacques François (Caen), Pierre Larrivée (chair, Caen), Peter Lauwers (Ghent), Nicole Le Querler (Caen), Beth Levin (Stanford), Andrej Malchukov (MPI), Yves Roberge (Toronto), Paul Rowlett (Salford), Robert Van Valin (Dusseldorf), Dominique Willems (Ghent)

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Page Updated: 23-Jan-2012

Supported in part by the National Science Foundation       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       ILIT Logo
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.