LINGUIST List 23.3916
|
Thu Sep 20 2012
Calls: English, Linguistics & Literature/UK
Editor for this issue: Alison Zaharee
<alison linguistlist.org>
|
Date: 20-Sep-2012
From: Peter Stockwell <peter.stockwell nottingham.ac.uk>
Subject: Cognitive Grammar in Literature: Symposium
E-mail this message to a friend
Full Title: Cognitive Grammar in Literature: Symposium
Date: 01-Feb-2013 - 01-Feb-2013
Location: Nottingham, United Kingdom
Contact Person: Peter Stockwell
Meeting Email: < click here to access email >
Web Site: http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/cral
Linguistic Field(s): Ling & Literature
Subject Language(s): English
Call Deadline: 31-Oct-2012
Meeting Description:
Within cognitive poetics, the close stylistic analysis of literary texts has been relatively neglected in favour of more conceptual aspects of worlds, framing, foregrounding and deictic positioning. More broadly in cognitive literary studies, the centrality of textuality and texture is also in danger of being forgotten. This symposium welcomes discussions applying different aspects of cognitive and construction grammars to the analysis of literary texts and readings.
Call for Papers: Participants should focus a 20 minute paper on a specific application of a literary text and reading. The aim will be to establish the utility of cognitive grammar in the service of literary stylistics. The symposium will be restricted to 10 papers and no more than 25 participants. Papers should be submitted in revised written form within two months of the symposium, for publication in a thematic book collection. By October 31, 2012, please send a short abstract of up to 150 words, specifying the literary text for analysis and which aspect of cognitive grammar will form the basis of the paper. If you would like to participate without presenting a paper, please also reply by this date to: aexwy nottingham.ac.uk.
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Page Updated: 20-Sep-2012
|
|
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|