LINGUIST List 23.4041
|
Sun Sep 30 2012
TOC: Critical Discourse Studies Virtual Series (2012)
Editor for this issue: Justin Petro
<justin linguistlist.org>
|
Date: 28-Sep-2012
From: Tara Thomas <tara.thomas taylorandfrancis.com>
Subject: Critical Discourse Studies Virtual Series (2012)
E-mail this message to a friend
Publisher: Routledge (Taylor and Francis) http://www.routledge.com/ Journal Title: Critical Discourse Studies Volume Number: Virtual Series Issue Number: Issue Date: 2012 Subtitle: Critical Approaches to Genre and Hybridity Main Text: Critical Approaches to Genre and Hybridity Critical Discourse Studies have released the fourth virtual special issue in the series which has been running throughout 2012. This issue is now available to read online, along with a full introduction to the series by Editor, John E. Richardson. This theme of this virtual special issue is 'Critical Approaches to Genre and Hybridity' and features seven specially selected articles from the journal which the editor felt best reflected this theme. The virtual special issue features the following articles (articles marked with an * are free to access): Rendering Equality and Diversity Policies in UK Higher Education Institutions* Politics of Mitigation The Teaching and Culture of Household Spanish: Understanding Racist Reproduction in 'Domestic' Discourse* Arab and American Computer War Games: The Influence of a Global Technology on Discourse Performing Citizenship on YouTube: Activism, Satire and Online Debate Around the Anti-Islam Video 'Fitna'* Generic Characteristics of the Office of the High Representative's Press Releases Read the virtual special issue online here: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/explore/rcds-virtual-issue-1.pdf Linguistic Field(s): Discourse Analysis Pragmatics Sociolinguistics Text/Corpus Linguistics Subject Language(s): Spanish (spa)
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Page Updated: 30-Sep-2012
|
|
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|