LINGUIST List 23.4269|
Fri Oct 12 2012
Calls: Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis, Socioling, Anthro Ling, Neuroling/India
Editor for this issue: Alison Zaharee
From: Igor Ž. Žagar <igor.zzagargmail.com>
Subject: Non-Verbal Means of Argumentation (Across Disciplines and Cultures)
E-mail this message to a friend
Full Title: Non-Verbal Means of Argumentation (Across Disciplines and Cultures)
Date: 08-Sep-2013 - 13-Sep-2013
Location: New Delhi, India
Contact Person: Igor Ž. Žagar
Meeting Email: < click here to access email >
Web Site: http://ipra.ua.ac.be/main.aspx?c=.CONFERENCE13
Linguistic Field(s): Anthropological Linguistics; Discourse Analysis; Neurolinguistics; Pragmatics; Sociolinguistics
Call Deadline: 24-Oct-2012
In the field of pragmatics, there has been a lot of work on non-verbal communication in the last decade(s). Extensive studies by Fernando Poyatos are especially salient (Nonverbal Communication across Disciplines (2002); Advances in Non-Verbal Communication: Sociocultural, Clinical, Esthetic and Literary Perspectives (1992); New Perspectives in Nonverbal Communication (1984), as well as work on gestures by Armstrong, Stokoe and Wilcox (Gesture and the Nature of Language (1995) and Streeck (Gesturecraft (2009)).
At approximately at the same time, the field of rhetoric and argumentation, in the last fifty years mostly influenced by classical rhetoric (Aristotel, Cicero, etc.), Perelman and Olbrecht-Tyteca's New Rhetoric (1958), Toulmin's The Uses of Arguments (1958), pragma-dialectics (van Eemeren, Grootendorst, Houtlosser, (1983 - )), and informal logic (Johnson, Blair, Govier, (1981 - )), started to open for new approaches, especially in visual argumentation (Groarke, Birdsell, van den Hove, (1996 - )). The pioneering work in this respect is a book by Michael Gilbert Coalescent Argumentation (1997) that introduces four modes of argument(ation): logical, emotional, visceral and kisceral.
This panel, organized within the 13th International Pragmatics Conference, would like to explore not just visual (and musical), gestural, emotional, and physical elements of argumentation, but also (and, if possibly, focusing on) smell, taste and touch as possible contributors to argumentation. Our basic concern will be the following two research questions:
1) Can visuals, music, gestures, (expressions of) emotions, smell, taste and touch stand alone as arguments?
2) Is it not that only the verbal 'glossing' and 'translation' turns smell, taste, touch, emotions, gestures, music and visuals into arguments?
Examples from different areas of expertise (and, if possible, different cultures) will be considered, and experts from different areas to contribute to the panel.
Igor Z. Zagar, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Leo Groarke, Windsor, Canada
Paul van den Hove, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Call for Papers:
Submissions are invited for abstracts for presentations in the 'Non-Verbal Means of Argumentation (Across Disciplines and Cultures)' panel at the 13th International Pragmatics Association Conference. Presentations will be up to 20 minutes with both individual question periods for each paper as well as a discussion of issues in non-verbal argumentation research more generally.
Abstract length: up to approximately 500 words (equivalent to max. one average A4 or Standard-size page, single spacing, Times pt 12)
Due date: October 24, by email to igor.zzagargmail.com
You will be notified of acceptance within four days. Accepted authors will then need to submit the same abstract to the general IPrA site themselves by November 1, 2012, which will also require IPrA membership.
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Page Updated: 12-Oct-2012
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.