* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *


LINGUIST List 23.4549

Wed Oct 31 2012

Calls: Morphology, Syntax, Typology/Croatia

Editor for this issue: Alison Zaharee <alisonlinguistlist.org>

Date: 31-Oct-2012
From: András Bárány <ab2081cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Workshop on Differential Subject Marking and Ergativity
E-mail this message to a friend

Full Title: Workshop on Differential Subject Marking and Ergativity
Short Title: DSM and Ergative Phenomena

Date: 18-Sep-2013 - 21-Sep-2013
Location: Split, Croatia
Contact Person: András Bárány
Meeting Email: < click here to access email >

Linguistic Field(s): Morphology; Syntax; Typology

Call Deadline: 12-Nov-2012

Meeting Description:

The ReCoS group at the University of Cambridge is organising a workshop at the 46th meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea (SLE) in September 2013 on 'Differential Subject Marking and Ergative Phenomena'.

This workshop aims at describing and possibly clarifying the relation between differential subject marking (DSM) and ergative phenomena. While differential object marking (DOM) has received much attention for many years, research on DSM is fairly new.

It has been claimed that DSM occurs primarily in ergative languages, whereas DOM is prevalent in accusative languages. This raises the interesting question of whether it possible to consider these two systems as surface manifestations of the same deep parameter, although this generalisation does not hold across all languages.

Another issue concerns potential parallels between DSM and DOM which have not, to our knowledge, been fully explored. It is well known, for example, that DOM is closely connected with movement of the object (scrambling) in many languages (e.g. Hindi, Persian, Turkish). While there are some instances where object movement appears to give rise to DSM, it is not clear widespread this is.

A further problem concerns how the availability of valency alternations interacts with alignment systems and differential marking. It has been claimed that passives are generally found in accusative systems whereas antipassives are limited to ergative systems. It is suggested that DSM occurs as an alternative strategy to passivisation in ergative languages.

In addition to addressing whether this typology really holds, we welcome papers that discuss whether this supposed distribution might follow from functional considerations or from more abstract constraints on the computational system. Of particular interest in this regard are the parallel contexts in which diathesis and DSM occur: both typically indicate the loss of volition on the part of the agent. Whether this is a fair characterisation of either phenomenon remains an interesting question. We particularly welcome data from understudied languages that might shed light on these issues.

2nd Call for Papers:

We invite 300 word abstracts on differential subject marking, its relation to ergative phenomena and valency alternations. The deadline for submission of these abstracts is 12 November 2012. The workshop proposal will be submitted to SLE together with the abstracts. If accepted, we will ask for full abstracts.

Links of Interest:

Full Call for papers: http://www.mml.cam.ac.uk/dtal/research/recos/activities/SLE13-DSM-Callforpapers.pdf
Cambridge Rethinking Comparative Syntax (ReCoS) group: http://www.mml.cam.ac.uk/dtal/research/recos/
46th SLE meeting: http://www.sle2013.eu/call-for-papers



Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue



Page Updated: 31-Oct-2012

Supported in part by the National Science Foundation       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       ILIT Logo
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.