LINGUIST List 23.504 Wed Feb 01 2012 FYI: All-New SpecGram (February 2012) Online Editor for this issue: Brent Miller <brentlinguistlist.org> New! Visit LL's Multitree project for over 1000 trees dynamically generated from scholarly hypotheses about language relationships:             http://multitree.linguistlist.org/ To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.cfm. Directory         1.     Trey Jones , All-New SpecGram (February 2012) Online Message 1: All-New SpecGram (February 2012) Online Date: 01-Feb-2012 From: Trey Jones <TreySpecGram.com> Subject: All-New SpecGram (February 2012) Online E-mail this message to a friend Greetings Linguists! The February 2012 issue of Speculative Grammarian--the premier scholarly journal featuring research in the neglected field of satirical linguistics--is now available online for your browsing pleasure. http://SpecGram.com/CLXIV.1/ This issue includes many excellent articles, including important ruminations on a special class of consonants, a scathing new critique of the previously well-respected Slater Method, and news of the most amazing linguistic concert event of the 21st century--along with the usual collection of letters from our readers, puzzles, and more... Next time (March 2012), we will have another all-new issue of Speculative Grammarian. Enjoy! -Trey Jones Managing Editor, Speculative Grammarian http://SpecGram.com P.S: Calling All Multilinguals! Are you fairly fluent in a language other than English? Are you willing to write or translate a few hundred words of text? If so, please help us with a secret new project! Email autogramspecgram.com for more info. If you can't sling the lingo, you can still help by sharing this request with others who might be able to. Thanks! Linguistic Field(s): General Linguistics Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue Page Updated: 01-Feb-2012       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.