Editor for this issue: Danniella Hornby
<daniellalinguistlist.org>
New! Visit LL's Multitree project for over 1000 trees dynamically generated from scholarly hypotheses about language relationships: http://multitree.linguistlist.org/
Links to the websites of all LINGUIST's supporting publishers are available at the end of this issue.
Date: 03-Feb-2012 From: Elke M. Milbli <milblinarr.de> Subject: On the Productivity of Verbal Prefixation in English: Schröder E-mail this message to a friend
Title: On the Productivity of Verbal Prefixation in English
Subtitle: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives
Series Title: Language in Performance, Vol. 44
Published: 2011
Publisher: Narr Francke Attempto Verlag GmbH + Co. KG
http://www.narr.de/
Author: Anne Schröder
Paperback: ISBN: 9783823365877 Pages: 375 Price: Europe EURO 68.00
Abstract:
One of the most far-reaching changes that has been observed for the English language was its progressive transformation from a highly inflectional language to a more analytic one. As a case in point, the postposition of the particle in particle verbs, as in to go out, has been interpreted to have triggered the unproductivity of the synthetic verbal prefix system, i.e. of verbs such as the now obsolete to outgo. Nevertheless, neologisms such as to upskill seemingly suggest a revival of this morphological pattern. Some of the questions which arise are thus: Is prefixation really an unproductive pattern of English verb- formation? Do the recent creations therefore indicate a revival of this pattern? Why has this type of verb-formation possibly been revived lately? To answer these questions, this study investigates the morphological productivity of prefix verbs by using different methods of measurement: on the basis of the OED, on the basis of various diachronic and synchronic corpora, and on the basis of elicitation tests.
Linguistic Field(s):
Historical Linguistics
Morphology
Syntax
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.