* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *


LINGUIST List 24.1487

Tue Apr 02 2013

TOC: Machine Translation 27/1 (2013)

Editor for this issue: Brent Miller <brentlinguistlist.org>

Date: 02-Apr-2013
From: Helen van der Stelt <Helen.vanderSteltspringer.com>
Subject: Machine Translation Vol. 27, No. 1 (2013)
E-mail this message to a friend

Publisher: Springer
http://www.springer.com

Journal Title: Machine Translation
Volume Number: 27
Issue Number: 1
Issue Date: 2013


Main Text:

DOI: 10.1007/s10590-012-9126-0
Title: Generalizing sampling-based multilingual alignment
Author(s): Adrien Lardilleux, François Yvon, Yves Lepage
pages: 1-23

DOI: 10.1007/s10590-012-9133-1
Title: Manual labour: tackling machine translation for sign languages
Author(s): Sara Morrissey, Andy Way
pages: 25-64

DOI: 10.1007/s10590-012-9127-z
Title: Book Review: Keiran J. Dunne and Elena S. Dunne (eds.): Translation and localization project management: the art of the possible
Author(s): Aram Morera Mesa
pages: 65-72

DOI: 10.1007/s10590-012-9128-y
Title: Book Review: Joseph Olive, Caitlin Christianson, John McCary (eds.): Handbook of Natural Language Processing and Machine Translation
Author(s): Kimmo Rossi
pages: 73-76

DOI: 10.1007/s10590-012-9131-3
Title: Book Review: Jörg Tiedemann: Bitext alignment
Author(s): Pavel Pecina
pages: 77-79

DOI: 10.1007/s10590-012-9130-4
Title: Book Review: Alejandro Moreno-Ramos et al.: Mox—illustrated guide to freelance translation
Author(s): Marco Cevoli
pages: 81-83


Linguistic Field(s): Computational Linguistics

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue



Page Updated: 02-Apr-2013

Supported in part by the National Science Foundation       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       ILIT Logo
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.