* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *

LINGUIST List 24.2128

Mon May 20 2013

TOC: Journal of Linguistics 49/2 (2013)

Editor for this issue: Brent Miller <brentlinguistlist.org>

Date: 20-May-2013
From: Katie Smith <kesmithcambridge.org>
Subject: Journal of Linguistics Vol. 49, No. 2 (2013)
E-mail this message to a friend

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Journal Title: Journal of Linguistics
Volume Number: 49
Issue Number: 2
Issue Date: 2013

Main Text:

Caroline Heycock, Nigel Fabb, Robert Borsley

Empirical evidence for laryngeal features: Aspirating vs. true voice languages
Michael Jessen, Jill Beckman, Catherine Ringen

An expectation-based account of subject islands and parasitism
Rui Chaves

Wide-domain <i>r</i>-effects in English
John Harris

Sentential negation in early child English
Rosalind Thornton, Graciela Tesan

Do contrastive topics exist?
Elena Titov

Join the dots: A musical interlude in the evolution of language?
Maggie Tallerman

Underlying representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Stig Eliasson

Gender, sexuality, and meaning: Linguistic practice and politics. Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 2011.
Deborah Cameron

Of minds and language: A dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Country.
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Christina Behme

Cross-disciplinary perspectives on lexical blending. Berlin & Boston, MA: De Gruyter
Mouton, 2012.
Natalia Beliaeva

LIN volume 49 issue 2 Cover and Back matter
LIN volume 49 issue 2 Cover and Front matter

Linguistic Field(s): Genetic Classification

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Page Updated: 20-May-2013

Supported in part by the National Science Foundation       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       ILIT Logo
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.