* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *

LINGUIST List 24.2363

Mon Jun 10 2013

Calls: Phonology, Morphology, Syntax, Semantics/Norway

Editor for this issue: Alison Zaharee <alisonlinguistlist.org>

Date: 10-Jun-2013
From: Martin Krämer <martin.krameruit.no>
Subject: Features in Phonology, Morphology, Syntax and Semantics: What Are They?
E-mail this message to a friend

Full Title: Features in Phonology, Morphology, Syntax and Semantics: What Are They?

Date: 31-Oct-2013 - 01-Nov-2013
Location: Tromsø, Norway
Contact Person: Martin Krämer
Meeting Email: < click here to access email >
Web Site: https://castl.uit.no/index.php/conferences/features-in-phonology-morphology-syntax-and-semantics

Linguistic Field(s): Morphology; Phonology; Semantics; Syntax

Call Deadline: 15-Jun-2013

Meeting Description:

Organizers: Martin Krämer, Peter Svenonius

All formal models of linguistics assume sets of features in terms of which generalizations can be stated. But the nature of the features themselves is often not explicitly addressed. In this conference we focus on the nature of features across phonology and syntax and related domains of linguistics.

One group of questions concerns the ‘grounding’ of features in substance or content. For example, phonological features may be grounded in phonetics, and syntactic features may be grounded in semantics. Innatist traditions have sometimes posited innate universal inventories of grounded features. The ‘substance-free’ movement in phonology argues instead that the formal properties of features can and should be radically dissociated from their grounding in content. Sign language phonology would seem to support this position, as the featural system of sign language phonology operates with a completely different set of articulators from those used in spoken languages. Minimalist syntax also frequently promotes the dissociation of formal properties of features from their content (as in the proposal that tense is simply one of a variety of ways in which Infl may be ‘grounded,’ favored in Indo-European languages but with various other languages opting for other content for Infl). Such proposals raise many questions concerning how feature systems are constrained to be uniform across languages and to what extent they are free to vary. The radically opposing view in phonology denies the existence of categorical features altogether and attempts to model phonological patterns as statistical computation of phonetic data.

The formal structure of features raises another set of questions. Complex patterns of feature locality gave rise to feature geometries in phonology, and these have been developed further to account for dependencies among features, not only in phonology but also in syntax. Cartographic work typically assumes linear hierarchies. To what extent are the various geometries and hierarchies motivated, and how might they be grounded in a broader explanatory theory?

Interacting with these questions about the ‘geometric’ relations among features is the algebraic structure of the features. For example, it is often assumed that privativity, in which opposition is marked by presence versus absence, is conceptually simplest and therefore the zero hypothesis. While in phonology the pendulum currently swings towards privativity, recently arguments have come from morphosyntax that features have binary values. While apparent ternary patterns in phonology have been taken as arguments in favor of binarity, such patterns have more recently been accounted for by reference to class nodes. Theories such as HPSG or Government Phonology assume much more complex relations among features (with HPSG even allowing feature-value matrices in which the values are feature-value matrices, extending to a kind of feature recursion, and GP positing government and licensing relations between features and positions).

In this 2-day conference we invite international researchers to address these and other questions about the nature of features in linguistic theory.

Invited Speakers:

Elan Dresher
Daniel Harbour
Elizabeth Ritter
Wendy Sandler

2nd Call for Papers:

We are looking forward to receiving your abstract for a 30 minute talk. Abstracts should be anonymous and should not exceed two A4 pages with 2.5 cm margins.

The pdf file containing your abstract should be submitted on or before 15 June 2013 via EasyAbs at:


There will be a limited budget to provide support for travel expenses for graduate students and post-docs with no research funds from their home institution. In case your abstract is accepted, you may apply for support.

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Page Updated: 10-Jun-2013

Supported in part by the National Science Foundation       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       ILIT Logo
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.