LINGUIST List 24.309: TOC: Diachronica 29/4 (2012)

LINGUIST List 24.309
Thu Jan 17 2013 TOC: Diachronica 29/4 (2012) Editor for this issue: Brent Miller <brentlinguistlist.org>
Date: 17-Jan-2013 From: Karin Plijnaar <karinbenjamins.nl> Subject: Diachronica Vol. 29, No. 4 (2012) E-mail this message to a friend Publisher: John Benjamins http://www.benjamins.com/ Journal Title: Diachronica Volume Number: 29 Issue Number: 4 Issue Date: 2012 Main Text: 2012. iii, 152 pp. Table of Contents Articles / Aufsätze Phonologically-constrained change: The role of the foot in monosyllabization and rhythmic shifts in Mainland Southeast Asia Marc Brunelle and Pittayawat Pittayaporn 411 – 433 The emergence of obstruents after high vowels David R. Mortensen 434 – 470 The principle of morphosyntactic subsystem integrity in language contact: Evidence from morphological borrowing in Resígaro (Arawakan) Frank Seifart 471 – 504 New methodologies for historical linguistics?: Calibrating a lexicon-based methodology for diffusion vs. subgrouping Mark Donohue, Tim Denham and Stephen Oppenheimer 505 – 522 Discussion Notes Basic vocabulary and Bayesian phylolinguistics: Issues of understanding and representation Simon J. Greenhill and Russell D. Gray 523 – 537 Consensus and the lexicon in historical linguistics: Rejoinder to “Basic vocabulary and Bayesian phylolinguistics” Mark Donohue, Tim Denham and Stephen Oppenheimer 538 – 546 Reviews / Comptes rendus / Besprechungen Low Saxon Dialects across Borders — Niedersächsische Dialekte über Grenzen hinweg. Edited by Alexandra N. Lenz, Charlotte Gooskens & Siemon Reker Reviewed by Jack Hoeksema 547 – 551 Analysing Variation in English. Edited by Warren Maguire & April McMahon Reviewed by James A. Walker 552 – 557 Editorial Joe’s Jottings 559 – 562 Linguistic Field(s): Historical Linguistics Phonology Read more issues\|LINGUIST home page\|Top of issue

Page Updated: 17-Jan-2013

Supported in part by the National Science Foundation

About LINGUIST | Contact Us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.