* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *


LINGUIST List 24.3278

Thu Aug 15 2013

Review: Ling & Literature; French: Bivort (2012)

Editor for this issue: Rajiv Rao <rajivlinguistlist.org>

Date: 07-Jul-2013
From: Elyse Petit <elysepetitgenetgmail.com>
Subject: La Littérature symboliste et la Langue
E-mail this message to a friend

Discuss this message

Book announced at http://linguistlist.org/issues/24/24-707.html

EDITOR: Olivier Bivort
TITLE: La Littérature symboliste et la Langue
PUBLISHER: Classiques Garnier
YEAR: 2012

REVIEWER: Elyse Barbara Petit, University of Arizona

SUMMARY

‘La Littérature symboliste et la Langue’ is a collection of studies written by
specialists in Symbolist literature and language, and presented during a
colloquium in Aoste, Italy, in 2009. This book contains 14 articles that
analyze in detail the close relationship between the Symbolist movement and
the Language Movement of the late 19th century. These analyses are varied and
present different perspectives on the topic. Some articles are more focused on
the French language from a linguistic point of view, while other studies
analyze French or Francophone writers and the influence of the Symbolist
movement in their writing.

‘Avant-Propos’, Olivier Bivort.

In this introduction, Bivort defines the Symbolist movement as a change of
literary language and prosody. According to him, the Symbolist movement is
opposed to the constraints of academic and traditional French language, and is
looking for a new poetic language. The book brings together studies that raise
issues related to the representation of literary language in the late 19th
century. Each chapter of the book presents a writer that is directly or
indirectly linked with the Symbolist movement and its renewal of literary and
prosodic rules.

‘Français vs Langue Française, La langue est-elle symbolique?’,
Jacques-Philippe Saint-Gérant.

In this study, the author exposes an overview of the French language in the
19th century from a linguistic and grammatical point of view. For the author,
the Symbolist movement is placed in opposition to the grammatical and
classical rules of linguistics. He explains that it is in the middle of the
19th century that the French language evolved in its forms and its
''discursive manifestations'' (14): tone, style, intonation, thematic
expressions, and tropes. He presents the literary movement of the last quarter
of the 19th century as a ''revolution of language'' (13) and demonstrates,
with specific examples, the attacks made by literary critics, grammarians and
linguists on the texts written by writers of the Symbolist movement. The
objective of the Symbolist literature that wants to create a new language is
fiercely criticized and this new language is presented as subjective and
individual, in opposition to the classical language commonly known as
collective and shared by all. The author’s perspective is essentially
linguistic and presents the Symbolist movement as a reworking of the
linguistic sign and its referent (15).

‘Baudelairisme , Brutalisme, Symbolisme’, André Guyaux.

In this analysis, the author conducts a study of the adjectives that literary
historians of the time used to characterize the work and the writing of
Baudelaire, especially in his celebrated book, ‘Les Fleurs du Mal’. Guyaux
presents Baudelaire as the precursor of the Symbolist movement, but he prefers
to put the poet in what he calls the ‘Baudelairisme movement’ rather than into
the Symbolist movement itself. Instead, Guyaux blames the Symbolist writers
for having lost the ''brutality'' of Baudelaire’s texts. For the specialist,
the poet anchors the reader in the reality of words and images; on the other
hand, the Symbolists went too far in their renewal of language and imagery by
waiving allegory and hypotyposis (36). This study is a statement of Symbolist
writing that opposes the ''brutality'' of Baudelaire's writing.

‘Autour de quelques aspects de la langue symbolique de Baudelaire dans les
fleurs du mal’, Mario Richter.

In this short article, the author presents two figures of speech used by
Baudelaire: symbolic allusion and ambiguity. Through specific examples drawn
from the collection of poems, ‘Les Fleurs du Mal’, Richter provides a detailed
study of the linguistic and stylistic contributions of these processes in the
message the poet wanted to convey. In addition, Richter shows the influence of
these figures of speech in the poetry of Symbolist writers.

‘Enumérations, Antithèses, Oxymores : lecture symboliste de Jean Lahor’, Liana
Nissim

In this study, the role of Jean Lahor in the history of the Symbolist movement
is presented. Considered a Parnassian poet who is not seeking the novelty of
the French poetic language, Jean Lahor belongs to the traditional literary
movement. At the time, he became a close friend of Mallarme whose influence
anchored the poet in a rhetorical and stylistic originality. The study
presents many examples of figures of speech used by the poet to express ''the
spectacle of the matter'' (51), a famous theme of Mallarme. The article
presents different themes and tropes that allow Jean Lahor to reveal the
matter.

‘TROUVER UNE LANGUE. Sur les caractères de la nouvelle langue prophétisée par
Rimbaud’, Sergio Cigada.

In this analysis, Cigada strives to demonstrate the argument offered by
Rimbaud on the history of poetry that he exhibited in ''Letter of the seer''
in May, 1871. According to the poet, there are three periods of poetry: Greek
poetry, the poetry of Baudelaire, and the poetry of the future. Through a
thorough study of Greek poetry based on Aristotle's Poetics, of the writing of
Baudelaire, and of Rimbaud's work on a “new” poetic language, Cigada shows the
correspondence between various embodiments of poetry that connect to the theme
of heterogeneity and the infinite world.

‘Obscurité de la langue, clarté de la poésie’, Olivier Bivort.

In this article, Bivort discusses the definition of ‘clarity’ by
distinguishing between the clarity of language and the clarity of speech, with
the former belonging to the linguistic field, and the latter representing
cultural and ideological phenomenon rooted in the 17th century. In this
tradition of seeking clarity of language and of speech, the Symbolist writers
were severely criticized in their search for the novelty of French poetic
language. Thus, Bivort shows that Symbolists in search of a new literary
language, placed poetic clarity and the darkness of language in opposition.

‘Sur le nom de Paphos : Mallarmé et le mystère d’un nom’, Jean-Nicolas Illouz.

This article presents a study of Mallarmé, especially of the last sonnet of
‘Poesies’, which illustrates the intellectual and spiritual work of the poet
and his poetic journey. Illouz’s analysis is divided into three parts. In the
first part, he recalls the initiative of Mallarmé, in 1860, to write a thesis
on language and presents the content of his thesis, which was never completed.
In the second part, Illouz refers to Mallarmé’s interest in mythologies and
ancient religions and to how he studied them with the aim of expanding
linguistic theory with an emphasis on divinity. Illouz supports his point of
view through the work of George Cox and Max Müller. Finally, Illouz presents
the last part of the ''initiative thesis'' (105) of Mallarmé: poetry. In this
part, the author explains, in detail, the last sonnet of ‘Poesies’.

‘Cet idiome […] qu’un contemporain doit connaitre’. A travers Les Mots anglais
de Stephane Mallarmé, Marco Modenesi.

Modenesi present the book ‘English Words’ written by Mallarmé, who wrote it in
order to earn money. However, the author proves that it is a work that is part
of the aesthetic writing of Mallarmé. Based on linguistic and semantic fields,
this study reveals the basics of poetic and aesthetic writing of the poet.

‘Le rêve d’une langue bornée mais infinie’ Laforgue poète langagier’,
Jean-Pierre Bertrand et Henri Scepi.

Presented in different parts, this paper shows how Laforgue does not attempt
to theorize the French language, but rather to understand and possess it in
order to reinvent it. In a thorough study, the two authors draw on the
origins, history and the writings of the poet in order to better understand
their reflection in language. According to them, Laforgue plays with language
through the use of humor and wordplay in order to confuse the clarity of
literary and conventional French, and to achieve a new language corresponding
with erotic desires.

‘La prose symboliste fut-elle l’aboutissement de l’écriture artiste ?’, Gilles
Philippe.

In this article, Philippe studies the stylistic evolution of prose in the 19th
century, especially in the 1880s. To prove his point, he studies the
transition from Impressionist writing to Symbolist prose according to two
criteria: lexical and grammatical. Neologism in the Impressionist style is
morphological in nature, whereas in the Symbolist style, it is metaphorical.
He explains that the transition is not radical, but rather moderate,
coinciding with the rise of the Symbolist movement. In the second part,
Philippe offers many examples of grammatical changes that took place between
Impressionist and Symbolist prose, such as nominalization, or the use of the
imperfect and the narrative present. He argues that syntactic and lexical
choices illustrate the lyrical sensitivity sought by the Symbolist movement,
and that the comparison made at the end of the 19th century between the
Impressionist and Symbolist schools should be viewed as moderate, even if it
shows radical morphological and syntactic changes.

‘Max Elskamp et les langues’, Christian Berg.

Berg delves into the world of Max Elskamp, a Belgian symbolist poet, and
reveals his contribution to the Symbolist movement. With varied examples taken
from the poet’s works, Berg presents the literary project of the poet and his
poetic space. In the second part, Berg examines, from a linguistic point of
view, the specificity of Elskamp’s writing. He examines the languages of the
poet: his native language (Flemish), as well as his adopted language (French),
but because he did not master these languages, Elskamp strived to manipulate
morphosyntax in order to create his own poetic language and overcome this
failure. Finally, Berg offers a detailed study of the enunciative frame
present in the poet’s different collections. This use of enunciation creates
one of the specificities of Elskamp’s writings and creative space.

‘De la langue de la Tribu aux mythes personnels. Le sang des crépuscules de
Charles Guerin’, Ida Merello.

Merello, in her article, talks about the writing of Charles Guerin and his
vision of Symbolist poetry. In presenting the poet and his work on the border
of Parnassus and the Symbolist movement, Merello shows the importance of
assonance in the creative space of the young poet who imagines ''assonance as
a keyboard of sounds and colors'' (my translation, 165). Merello shows a close
connection between Guerin's reflection on the impact of assonance and the
research conducted by Louis Becq Fouquières on the correspondence between
sound and meaning in theatrical works. In a comprehensive study of ‘Blood of
Twilight’, especially of the sonnet ‘The Dreams Picker’, the author reveals
the richness of Guerin’s poetic space, while anchoring his work in the
''search for a perfect game between sounds, language and speech” (my
translation, 173).

‘La réflexion métalinguistique de Camille Mauclair et ses retombées
stylistiques’, Simonetta Valenti.

By analyzing the work and writings of the poet and literary critic Camille
Mauclair, Valenti presents ''The reflection of Mauclair on language'' (my
translation, 178). Valenti states that the poet's language is the instrument
that allows access to the main function of poetry, namely ''the pursuit of
mystery that founded the universe'' (my translation, 178). In order to achieve
this, it is important to control language, not as a tool of communication, but
as a method to suggest universal harmony. The linguistic processes used by
Mauclair are symbols and free verses, which Valenti examines in detail in the
texts of the poet and in the history of the Symbolist movement. Finally, based
on the work of Mallarmé that Mauclair has studied, in which she found
inspiration, Valenti demonstrates the importance of morphosyntax and its
renewal in Symbolist poetry in order to achieve the ultimate goal: to reflect
the Absolute.

‘Pour une langue sensible. L’héritage symboliste dans l’écriture proustienne’,
Marisa Verna.

In this study, Verna discusses the rhetorical process of thematic association
used in the writing of Proust to emphasize ''the complex relation of
inheritance, of denial, of surpassing that characterizes the relationship
between Proust and Symbolist language” (my translation, 201). The author
relies on a passage of ‘In Search of Lost Time’, especially on the description
of the painting ‘The Port of Carquethuit of Elstirs’. Before starting the
analysis of the passage from Proust, Verna exposes the position of the writer
in relation to Symbolist writing and presents various texts (especially in
Baudelaire) in which Proust found inspiration and from which he created an
aesthetic view of new writing. Through a detailed description of the excerpt,
and by drawing on many artistic and literary references (e.g. Ovid, Rimbaud,
Chateaubriand), Verna shows the pervasiveness of the thematic association
process in Proust’s work and its role in the aesthetics of his writing.

EVALUATION

This book gives an overview of the Symbolist and linguistic movements from the
19th century. Divided into 14 articles, it offers various perspectives on the
topic. Every article analyzes the evolution of language in different literary
texts. The analyses encompass the role of writers and/or the influence of
their writings in their respective literary domain. The authors provide
studies that look deep for linguistic aspects in the Symbolist poetic field.
Even if the articles are connected to each other in terms of topic, readers
can easily browse through the book without following its chronological order.
The book allows readers to acquire a better understanding and greater
knowledge of the Symbolist movement. The detailed analyses of different
writers provided in each article enrich readers’ grasp of linguistic,
stylistic as well as poetic issues. The richness of figures of speech and
Symbolist themes that characterize poetry of the time is provided in various
examples of texts. This book offers a great understanding of the separation
between the traditional and conventional poetry of Parnasse and the search for
a new language proposed by Symbolist poets. Every author exposes, in a
personal manner, the transition that took place at the time, but agrees with
the theory that the Symbolist poets created, through their view of the world:
a new poetic language.

Two articles in this collection that are particularly compelling are: ‘
Français vs Langue Française, La langue est-elle symbolique?’, written by
Saint-Gérant ; and ‘La prose symboliste fut-elle l’aboutissement de l’écriture
artiste ?’, by Philippe. These two chapters present the Symbolist movement in
its progression, yet also in contrast with the traditional writing of the
time. Both authors emphasize different aspects of French language: linguistic,
morphological, rhetorical and poetic. These articles allow readers to embrace
the evolution of the French language during the 19th century through the
presentation of different literary movements, such as the Impressionist or the
Parnasse schools, in order to get a better overview of the necessity of the
Symbolist movement, as seen by many authors. Finally, these two articles give
readers a better understanding of other articles in the collection that offer
a more detailed discussion of specific poets’ writing.

Overall, this collection is particularly intended for graduate students
studying French literature, and professors who want to provide detailed
articles on the Symbolist movement and/or its writers in their courses. The
readers will appreciate the accessibility of the writing style of the
chapters, as well as the wide range of texts, authors and ideas featured in
the book, all of which will allow future researchers passionate about the
Symbolist movement to find material to deepen their knowledge.


ABOUT THE REVIEWER

Elyse Petit just graduated with an MA in French from the University of
Arizona and will attend the doctoral program in Second Language
Acquisition and Teaching at the same university, beginning in Fall 2013. Her research
interests center around SLA in the development of intercultural competence,
multiliteracy approaches to culture and language teaching, teaching French
as a foreign language, and language use in cultural representations provided
in multimedia and literature.
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue



Page Updated: 15-Aug-2013

Supported in part by the National Science Foundation       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       ILIT Logo
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.