* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *


LINGUIST List 24.3565

Wed Sep 11 2013

TOC: Journal of Argumentation in Context 2/2 (2013)

Editor for this issue: Justin Petro <justinlinguistlist.org>

Date: 11-Sep-2013
From: Karin Plijnaar <karin.plijnaarbenjamins.nl>
Subject: Journal of Argumentation in Context Vol. 2, No. 2 (2013)
E-mail this message to a friend

Publisher: John Benjamins
http://www.benjamins.com/

Journal Title: Journal of Argumentation in Context
Volume Number: 2
Issue Number: 2
Issue Date: 2013


Main Text:

2013. iii, 100 pp.

Table of Contents

Articles

Responses to an opponent’s nonverbal behavior in a televised debate: Audience perceptions of credibility and likeability
Harry Weger, Jr, John S. Seiter, Kimberly A. Jacobs and Valerie Akbulut 179 – 203

Argumentation in hypertext: A case study of NGOs’ campaigning
Chiara Degano 204 – 225

Argument kinds and argument roles in the Ontario provincial election, 2011
Hans V. Hansen and Douglas N. Walton 226 – 258

Book reviews

Benoît Frydman/Michel Meyer (eds.): Chaïm Perelman (1912–2012). De la nouvelle rhétorique à la logique juridique
Reviewed by Manfred Kienpointner 259 – 266

Ana Patricia Macedo, The development of children’s argument skills. Thesis
Reviewed by Celine Miserez Caperos 267 – 268

I. Fairclough and N. Fairclough, Political discourse analysis. A method for advanced students.
Reviewed by Assimakis Tseronis 269 – 278


Linguistic Field(s): Discourse Analysis
                            Pragmatics
                            Text/Corpus Linguistics

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue



Page Updated: 11-Sep-2013

Supported in part by the National Science Foundation       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       ILIT Logo
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.