LINGUIST List 24.4153|
Tue Oct 22 2013
Calls: Text/Corpus Ling, Ling Theories, Semantics, Syntax, Historical Ling/Poland
Editor for this issue: Bryn Hauk
From: Ana Díaz-Negrillo <sleugr.es>
Subject: From Methodology Back to Theory
E-mail this message to a friend
Full Title: From Methodology Back to Theory
Date: 11-Sep-2014 - 14-Sep-2014
Location: Poznań, Poland
Contact Person: Martin Hilpert
Meeting Email: < click here to access email >
Linguistic Field(s): Historical Linguistics; Linguistic Theories; Semantics; Sociolinguistics; Syntax; Text/Corpus Linguistics
Call Deadline: 15-Nov-2013
Theme session at the 47th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea
11-14 September 2014, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland
Title: From methodology back to theory: How do current empirical methods feed back into linguistic theory?
Recent work in cognitive-functional linguistics has increasingly turned towards a usage-based understanding of language, and it treats its object of study as heterogeneous, usage-conditioned, semantically motivated, and context-dependent (e.g., Geeraerts 2010). Given these assumptions, variation and change, along dimensions such as semantic structure, sense relations, grammatical patterns, or socio-cultural and contextual profiling, constitute an inherent characteristic of language. This development has brought with it the adoption of variationist corpus methods, which yield descriptively precise, predictive, and falsifiable findings. The proposed theme session addresses the question how these methodological innovations feed back into cognitive-functional theory. Are the empirical results being taken up to refine theoretical notions, or to rethink linguistic concepts?
The organizers of this theme session hold that the answer to this question is in the affirmative. The empirical tools currently employed in usage-based linguistics are extensive and have been successfully applied in synchronic and diachronic variational linguistics (e.g., Geeraerts et al. 1994; Heylen 2005; Gries 2006; Divjak & Gries 2006; Gries and Hilpert 2008, 2010; Hilpert 2008, 2011, 2013; Hilpert and Gries 2009; Glynn 2009, 2010; Divjak 2010; Szmrecsanyi 2013; Fabiszak et al. 2013). Methods such as Correspondence Analysis (Glynn In press), Cluster Analysis (Divjak & Fieller In press), Multidimensional Scaling (Cox & Cox 2001), Motion Charts (Hilpert 2011), Logistic Regression Analysis (Speelman In press) are well-suited to address many of the open questions in usage-based linguistics: What is the exact role of frequency and repetition? How is knowledge of abstract syntactic constructions organized? How do we model lexical variation in a usage-based, socio-cognitive framework? What is the relation between conceptual structure and socio-cultural profiling? Questions such as these are commonly touched on by empirical studies, but perhaps the link to theoretical issues could be stressed more prominently than it has been done to date.
Call for Papers:
We therefore call for contributions addressing these and other pertinent questions regarding any lexical or grammatical aspect of usage-based variational linguistics, with special focus on how the empirical results of the studies serve to inform a problem of theoretical relevance.
For More Information:
Małgorzata Fabiszak: fagosiawa.amu.edu.pl
Martin Hilpert: martin.hilpertunine.ch
Karolina Krawczak: karolinawa.amu.edu.pl
Instructions for Abstract Submission:
Short abstracts of 300 words (excluding references) and specifying (a) the research questions, (b) the data and method, and (c) the (expected) results, should be sent to: karolinawa.amu.edu.pl.
Deadline: 15 November 2013
Notification: 25 November 2013
If accepted, longer abstracts of 500 words (excluding references) will need to be submitted separately to the central conference organizers by the 15 January 2014. Further information available at: http://sle2014.eu/abstract-submission.
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Page Updated: 22-Oct-2013
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.