* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *


LINGUIST List 24.65

Tue Jan 08 2013

TOC: Review of Cognitive Linguistics 10/2 (2012)

Editor for this issue: Brent Miller <brentlinguistlist.org>

Date: 21-Dec-2012
From: Karin Plijnaar <karinbenjamins.nl>
Subject: Review of Cognitive Linguistics Vol. 10, No. 2 (2012)
E-mail this message to a friend

Publisher: John Benjamins
http://www.benjamins.com/

Journal Title: Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Volume Number: 10
Issue Number: 2
Issue Date: 2012


Subtitle: Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Social and Cultural Variation in Cognition and Language Use


Main Text:

2012. v, 213 pp.

Table of Contents

Introduction

The emergence of Cognitive Sociolinguistics: An introduction
Martin Pütz, Justyna A. Robinson and Monika Reif
241 – 263

Articles

What is to be learned: The community as the focus of social cognition
William Labov
265 – 293

Variation, structure and norms
Peter Harder
294 – 314

Flexibility and change in distributed cognitive systems: A view from Cognitive Anthropology
David B. Kronenfeld
315 – 345

Pragmatic variation and cultural models
Klaus P. Schneider
346 – 372

Cognitive Sociolinguistics in L2-variety dictionaries of English
Hans-Georg Wolf and Frank Polzenhagen
373 – 400

Spread of on-going changes in an immigrant language
A. Seza Doğruöz and Stefan Th. Gries
401 – 426

Defining the cognitive mechanisms underlying reactions to foreign accented speech: An experimental approach
Andrew J. Pantos
427 – 453


Linguistic Field(s): Cognitive Science
                            Sociolinguistics

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue



Page Updated: 08-Jan-2013

Supported in part by the National Science Foundation       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       ILIT Logo
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.