* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *

LINGUIST List 24.91

Wed Jan 09 2013

Qs: Lexicalization of Negative Senses

Editor for this issue: Brent Miller <brentlinguistlist.org>

Date: 08-Jan-2013
From: Ljuba Veselinova <ljubaling.su.se>
Subject: Lexicalization of Negative Senses
E-mail this message to a friend

I am looking for data and literature on lexicalized negative senses such as ’not know’, ’not want’, ’not like’, ‘not listen’, ‘not believe’ or any other expressions that can be semantically decomposed into a negative element and a positive sense. In the data I currently have, such lexicalicalizations appear to be of two kinds
(i) more or less transparent fusions of a negation marker and an affirmative form as in modern spoken French /ʃepas/ < sais pas < [je ne] sais pas
(ii) completely unanalyzable, most probably lexical, stems as in Tundra Nenets in (1a). Such stems have no formal resemblance with either the positive form (1b) or the marker of standard negation (1c)
(1a) jexerasj ‘not know’
(1b) ténewasj ‘know’
(1c) n’i- negative auxiliary for standard negation

I also have the impression that forms meaning ‘I don’t know’ may often split from the paradigm and develop a more grammatical uses. For instance, the Tundra Nenets form jekarɁ ‘I don’t know’ is described as a particle and can be used as short negative answer as well as a negative particle external to the proposition (Wagner-Nagy 2011: 129-131).

So far I have data on such lexicalizations from Slavic, Uralic and Polynesian, and also from some dozen languages outside these families. I would like to check the extent of this phenomenon in a larger cross-linguistic sample. Such data are harder to come by than it might seem for several reasons: (a) they are not necessarily included in grammars; (b) they are more suitable to be looked up in a dictionary but for many poorly described languages, there are no dictionaries.

I am aware of the literature on lexicalization (some key references are listed below) and also of work on negative modals. An early note on similar lexicalizations is found in Jespersen (1917). Croft (1991: 14-15) mentions verbs meaning ‘not-want’ and ‘not-like’ for Mam, Yapese, Tagalog, Wintu and Latin.

As I said in the beginning, data and pointers to literature on this phenomenon will be greatly appreciated. I will summarize if there is interest.

Thank you in advance for your time and help.

My best wishes,

Brinton, Laurel J., and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Caink, Andrew. 2000. Full Form Auxiliaries in Serbian/Croatian/Bosnian. In ANNUAL WORKSHOP ON FORMAL APPROACHES TO SLAVIC LINGUISTICS: THE PHILADELPHIA MEETING 1999, King, Tracy Holloway & Sekerina, Irina A. [Eds], Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications, 2000, pp 61-77, ed. Andrew Caink.
Croft, William. 1991. The Evolution of Negation. Journal of Linguistics 27:1-39.
de Haan, Ferdinand. 1997. The Interaction of Negation and Modality: A Typological Study: Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics Series: Garland Publishers.
Goddard, Cliff. 2001. Lexico-semantic universals: A critical overview. Linguistic Typology 5:1-65.
Grygar-Rechziegel, Adela. On the Typology of Czech Negative Adjectives. In STUDIES IN WEST SLAVIC AND BALTIC LINGUISTICS, Barentsen, A. A., Groen, B. M., & Sprenger, R. [Eds], Atlanta, GA: Rodopi, 1991, pp 107-165, ed. Adela Grygar-Rechziegel.
Hopper, Paul, and Traugott, Elizabeth. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jespersen, Otto. 1917. Negation in English and other languages. København: Hovedkommissionær: Andr, Fred, Høst & Søn, KGL. Hof-boghandel, Bianco Lunos Bogtrykkeri.
Kim, Yong-Joo. 1997. Verb Lexicalization Patterns in Korean-With Focus on Motion Conflation in Complex Verb Constructions. In JAPANESE/KOREAN LINGUISTICS, VOL. 6, Sohn, Ho-min, & Haig, John [Eds], Stanford, CA: Center Study Language & Information, 1997, pp 495-511, ed. Yong-Joo Kim.
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, Vanhove, Martine, and Koch, Peter. 2007. Typological approaches to lexical semantics. Linguistic Typology 11:159-185.
Melnar, Lynette Renee. Caddo Verb Morphology, Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences.
Moreno-Cabrera, Juan C. 1998. On the relationships between grammaticalization and lexicalization. In The Limits of Grammaticalization, eds. Anna Giacalone Ramat and Paul Hopper, 211-227. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Na, Young-Hee. 1981. A Constraint on the Lexicalization of Negation. Papers from the Regional Meetings, Chicago Linguistic Society 17:239-248.
Newman, John. 2002. A Cross-Linguistic Overview of the Posture Verbs 'Sit', 'Stand', and 'Lie': THE LINGUISTICS OF SITTING, STANDING, AND LYING, Newman, John [Ed], Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Netherlands.
Shaffer, Barbara. 2002. CAN'T: The Negation of Modal Notions in ASL. Sign Language Studies 3:34-53.
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, ed. Timothy Shopen, 58-149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. From Polysemy to Semantic Change: Towards a Typology of Lexical Semantic Associations. Linguistic Typology 14:292-299.
Wagner-Nagy, Beáta. 2011. On the typology of negation in Ob-Ugric and Samoyedic Languages. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura -- Société Finno-Ougrienne -- Finno-Ugrian Society.
Van Der Auwera, Johan. 1996. Modality: The Three-Layered Scalar Square. Journal of Semantics 13:181-195.
Van der Auwera, Johan. 2001. On the Typology of Negative Modals. In PERSPECTIVES ON NEGATION AND POLARITY ITEMS, Hoeksema, Jack, Rullmann, Hotze, Sanchez-Valencia, Victor, & Van der Wouden, Ton [Eds], Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp 23-48, ed. Johan Van der Auwera.
Viberg, Åke. 1993. Crosslinguistic perfectives on lexical organization and lexical progression. In Progression and regression in language sociocultural, neuropsychological and linguistic perspectives, eds. Kenneth Hyltenstam and Åke Viberg, 340-385. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Linguistic Field(s): Semantics

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Page Updated: 09-Jan-2013

Supported in part by the National Science Foundation       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       ILIT Logo
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.