* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *

LINGUIST List 25.1369

Fri Mar 21 2014

Qs: PhD norming study Part II

Editor for this issue: Alex Isotalo <alxlinguistlist.org>

Date: 21-Mar-2014
From: Halszka Bąk <hbakwa.amu.edu.pl>
Subject: PhD norming study Part II
E-mail this message to a friend

Dear Colleagues,

I kindly ask any and all NATIVE SPEAKERS OF ENGLISH to complete the following questionnaire:


The questionnaire contains sentences to assess, and it is the first part of a norming study for my PhD, which focuses on certain aspects of the emotion-language interface.
The questionnaire should take about 35 minutes to complete. Any comments will be greatly appreciated, as will be every respondent.

I will be most obliged for your time and professional application to the task.

Thank you in advance for your kind attention and help,

Halszka Bąk, MA (http://wa.amu.edu.pl/wa/bak_halszka)
Interdisciplinary PhD Program: Language, Society, Technology and Cognition
Language and Communication Laboratory (http://wa.amu.edu.pl/lcl/)
Faculty of English (http://wa.amu.edu.pl/wa/en)
Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań

Linguistic Field(s): Anthropological Linguistics
                            Applied Linguistics
                            Cognitive Science
                            Computational Linguistics
                            Discourse Analysis
                            General Linguistics
                            Language Acquisition
                            Text/Corpus Linguistics

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Page Updated: 21-Mar-2014

Supported in part by the National Science Foundation       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       ILIT Logo
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.