* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *

LINGUIST List 27.1440

Fri Mar 25 2016

Fund Drive 2016: Who Will Win the Challenge?

Editor for this issue: Ashley Parker <ashleylinguistlist.org>

***************** LINGUIST List Support *****************

Fund Drive 2016
25 years of LINGUIST List!
Please support the LL editors and operation with a donation at:

Date: 25-Mar-2016
From: LINGUIST List <linguistlinguistlist.org>
Subject: Fund Drive 2016: Who Will Win the Challenge?
E-mail this message to a friend

Dear LINGUIST List Subscribers,

Thank you to all who have supported us in the first day of Fund Drive 2016! We are a long way from our goal, but we are very appreciative for the donations we've received and those that we will receive throughout the duration of our event.

We are excited to introduce you to our Fund Drive Challenges, where we track our top donors by university, country, and subfield. Last year, our top donors were:

1. Indiana University Bloomington
2. University of Washington
3. Stanford University

1. United States
2. Germany
3. United Kingdom

1. Computational Linguistics
2. Syntax
3. Sociolinguistics

Who will take the top spots this year? We are excited to track the progress through these challenges, and encourage our subscribers to rally participation from their respective universities, countries, and subfields!

To make a donation, please visit http://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/.

We thank everyone for their support and ask all of our subscribers to show their support in any amount that they can!

The LINGUIST List Team

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Page Updated: 25-Mar-2016

Supported in part by the National Science Foundation       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us      
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.