Editor for this issue: <>
Margaret Fleck notes that -ish can be added after a sentence, and expresses surprise since it isn't normally an independent word. Ok, it may not be independent in the way that, say, DOG is; but it combines quite freely with syntactically-formed phrases, especially time-phrases: half past seven-ish eight o'clock-ish nine-thirty-ish This in itself suggests that it may be a separate word, combined with a whole phrase - i.e. a clitic along the lines of 's, as in _the king of Spain's daughter_. It would be very interesting to see how any of our existing generative grammar theories could accommodate the restriction to a phrase which defines a time of day. Dick Hudson Dept of Phonetics and Linguistics, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT (071) 387 7050 ext 3152 home: (081) 340 1253Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
In response to Margaret Fleck's note about Ish: it's widespread. My students do it. But I've no idea how well established it is, or what regions/classes/age groups it covers. Plenty of interesting research to be done here. I'll try to interest someone in doing a dissertation on it.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I received three possible etymologies of "def" from Linguist readers (thanks!): (1) The Afrikaaner Hypothesis: "deftig" means 'smart' or 'chic' in Afrikaaner. Respondent was not sure of use in Nederlands. (2) The Death Hypothesis: possibly an alteration of the word "death", with final /th/ becoming /f/. The semantic connection: the phrase 'to death' is used to mean 'extremely', as in `They discussed it to death', `I love you to death', etc. We also say related things like 'to die for' meaning 'extremely good'. (3) The Definite Hypothesis: possibly a back-formation of "definitely" or "definitive", on the model of "fab" for fabulous.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue