Editor for this issue: <>
Try this one: Will will will Will's will, will Will? A bit ungrammatical, but interesting just the same. Stan C. Kwasny Center for Intelligent Computer Systems Department of Computer Science Washington UniversityMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I came in late to the 'many tokens of the same type word in a row'
discussion, but I do know that the "had" example ("John, where Jack
had had "had", had had...") appears as an exercise in Hans Reichenbach's
_Elements of Symbolic Logic_, Macmillan, 1947, p. 405.
Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
>>The painter, painting the sign over the bar had left no space >>between dog and "and" and "and" and duck. . Using the same construct for Russian you can get long sequences of the same LETTER: . Begin with: Vo imja Devy Marii i Iisusa (in the name of virgin Mary and Jesus) . Then think also of the St.Ija: Vo imja Devy Marii, i Ii i Iisusa . And than take care of the spaces: Nuzhno ostavit' probely mezdy slovami "Marii" i "i", "i" i "Ii", "Ii" i "i" i "i" i "Iisusa" (One should put spaces between the words ...) . Arkady Borkovsky Dialog Information Services (415)858-3744Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Re: "John, where Mary had had "had" ..." I learned this from my grandfather in the mid sixties. My impression was that he had learned it "in school," which would put its origin at least before 1920. The Dutch wax and German flies are nice, but my favorite is still the Latin: Malo malo malo malo. (I'd rather be in an apple tree than an evil man in adversity.) No, I'm not claiming it's natural... Will Dowling (willMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuefranklin.com)
For parsing opaqueness, nothing in the 7 or less familiar word range, with limited recursion can touch "The player kicked the ball kicked him." I find this is a good example to use in my pyscholinguistics classes, not only to illustrate some aspects of syntax and parsing, but also as a test of supposedly "psychologically real" parsing models. The point is that these models DO parse this without a glitch yet humans almost NEVER do. There's some discussion in:Limber, J. (1976). Syntax and sentence interpretation. In R. Wales (Ed.), Walker, E. C. T. (pp. ). Amsterdam: North Holland.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
'Eer was was was, was was is' I think that's parsable but i find the following easier: 'Eer was was was was was is is' or 'Eer was was was was was is was' or (in these one was is a contraction of wat is, it should be written wa's, i guess) AnnieMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue