Editor for this issue: <>
For information on Galician and what is being published about it, see the yearly bibliography issue of the "Comparative Romance Linguistics Newsletter", published every spring through the Comparative Linguistics discussion group of the MLA. I don't have a current mailing address at home, but if anyone wants it, I'll be glad to post it from my office during the week. Margaret WintersMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Hooked on Phonics It may work for adults who cannot read and who know the content and context of words. But for children it appears to allow them to 'read' sounds or replicate sounds. It depends what you mean by reading. If you beleive readers interact with text rather than decode sound/meaning relationships then "Hooked on Phonics" does not work Dom Berducci----berducciMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuelinc.cis.upenn.edu
I too have heard the radio ads for "Hooked on Phonics," which aim to strike at our fears of a literacy crisis. They encourage the presumably illiterate adult audience (else why listen to radio?) to call a phone number which requires, ironically, a knowledge of the beginnings of the alphabet and promise what all the other quick-fix language ads over the years have promised: to make you (the sucker) who always feared you were worse than everyone else and whose language use continually reinforced that fear, finally just as good as your rivals and peers. You may have heard as well the ads for tapes that will improve your vocabulary (They begin, "People judge you by the words you use..." or something of the like)-- which you can listen to in your car while you're stuck in traffic (nothing to memorize, nothing to read--another quick fix for a major malaise). If I'm not mistaken, H-O-Ph does something like make sounds into songs, making reading fun (almost as fun as listening to the radio-- the station I've heard the commercial on is an all-news Chicago station). And the NCTE I believe has come out with a strong denunciation of the hucksterism involved in this particular program. No, I don't know if it works, but I wouldn't bet on it or anything else sandwiched between sound bites and competing ads for reconditioned copy machines and basement de-waterers. Context, as we know from reading, is all! Dennis Baron debaronMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueuiuc.edu Dept. of English office: 217-244-0568 University of Illinois messages: 217-333-2392 608 S. Wright St fax: 217-333-4321 Urbana IL 61801
> LRUDOLPHMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuevax.clarku.edu On Phonics vs. visual recognition of word shapes, the two methods seem to be complementary and both necessary to optimum pedagogy. See Marilyn Adams' book surveying the issues, published last year. Bruce Nevin bn
bbn.com
TO THE FELLOW NEEDING INFO ON CAL--THE ADDRESS IS CENTER FOR APPLIED LINGUISTICS 1118 22ND ST., NW WASHINGTON, DC 20022 (202)429-9292Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
The "bow-wow" and other ding-dong origin theories are mentioned in Max Muller's late 19th disagreements with Darwin's remarks on language origins in Origin of Species. Muller, I believe,was being sarcastically skeptical of the idea that human language could have been distilled from the cries of animals and the song dialects of birds Darwin mentions. I don't have a specific reference handy but they are in Limber, J. (1982). What can chimps tell us about the origins of language . In S.Kuczaj (Ed.), Language Development: Volume 2 (pp. 429-446). Hillsdale, NJ: L. E. Erlbaum. Its been quite while and I don't recall if Muller himself concocted these or just used them.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue