Editor for this issue: <>
in my last posting on linguistic discourse, i was talking about correspondence between leonard bloomfield and roman jaKobson, not leonard bloomfield and polly jaCobson. (maybe i should get one of these spell checkers you all keep writing about...)Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Thank you Vicki Fromkin and Ellen Prince for bringing some 'light' into this discussion. Jeanette GundelMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
As a new linguistics grad student, I was delighted to find out that I wasn't the only person on earth who played little mind games with words and sounds in language when I was a kid. One fellow student said that every linguistics person she had talked to about this did the same thing. For us, language was intriguing, fascinating--in short, fun. Now, we've grown up and are getting graduate degrees, teaching jobs, tenure, book contracts. Such serious things! Maybe I'm still just naive, but I've decided to try my best not to let something I got into for the sheer intellectual joy of it be an occasion for alienating another human being. What's to get acrimonious about? This isn't AIDS, or the Brazilian rain forests, or nuclear weapons. This is theoretical linguistics; let's have fun with it!Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue