Editor for this issue: <>
The 1 Mar posting on Spanish <el/la> by Alexis Manaster Ramer (AMR) is a good informative introduction for readers unfamiliar with the topic, but as far as I can detect it contributes no new insight to careful discussions in the literature. In particular: 1. Coverage of dialect variation is incomplete (it was not intended to be otherwise). Perhaps the most interesting case not mentioned is that of <el buen hada aquella>, discussed at the LSA meeting in Chicago, 1991. 2. The other side of the variation coin is that there are millions of speakers of dialects in which the facts are clear and stable -- e.g. <avestruz> is invariably masculine and regular in every way, <azucar> is invariably feminine but takes <el> despite unstressed initial <a>, compounds like <aguanieve> and diminutives like <ag"uita> are invariably feminine but predictably take <el>, speakers unhesitatingly pick <el arba> for AMR's hypothetical feminine carriage or gazelle, and so forth and so on. AMR's posting suggests that "to the extent that there are speakers who say [...]" something different, theoretical claims based on such clear and invariable data "would appear to be on shaky ground". But since the theoretical claims in question (at least the ones I know about) in no way exclude the possibility of dialect variation, it is rather AMR's suggestion that appears to lack firm foundation. (Of course, the claims could easily be wrong for countless other reasons -- that's not at issue). Jim HarrisMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
There's no other way to redeem the place of linguistics in American education than through the education system. So I agree (with what I and others have already said in this medium) that it's termendously important what we teach in intro courses, and what we say to our colleagues in other disciplines. And it's also important that more linguists get on the band wagon to teach linguistics in the high schools. I'm involved in teaching such, in programs like those for gifted, and/or college-track, high school kids, and I'm sure there are many high schools with such programs that are crying for college professors to teach such courses. This summer I'll be teaching a field methods course, and am really looking forward to it! Carol Georgopoulos Linguistics Program University of UtahMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Yeah, I saw a Klingon-English phrase book down at the book store -- interesting aglutinations. There are quite a few OVS and OSV languages in the Amazon area: Hixkaryana is OVS (COrrect me, Des Darbyshire) and I think Satere is OSV. There is a Handbook of Amazonian Languages out there somewhere that you could find. Maybe someone can send you a concrete reference. As to getting linguistics into the elementary and middle schools, let me not speak of sentence diagramming, but rather light a candle: My daughter did a science fair project in 5th grade with phonetic symbolism contrasting the influence of consonants with vowels (vowels win) and a science fair this year also on phonetic symbolism trying to determine the influence of syllable stress (didn't make a difference). The first science fair really enthused her teachers and the second won best of show and is going to regional sci. fair. Obviously we're talking of psycholinguistics, but at least some people have heard of Sapir, Greenberg, and others and the idea has been gotten across that language has some interesting facets. Some aspects of linguistics are hard to explain, but there are accessible facets. For example, I betyou could do a good sci. fair project on quantifier dialects (scope of negation with universal quanti- fiers) or on acquisition of some syntactic structure. If you've got kids and you're going to have to help them think of a project anyway, maybe you can do something with linguistics even if it isn't what you'd really like best. Finally, I'd say that Deborah Tannen's (sp?) two books on sociolinguistics of male and female discourse are definitely out in the popular realm and selling well while being the results of serious work. I only glanced through them but they left me with a favorable impression.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
There are some OVS languages in the Carib family, all in the Amazon Basin, namely: Hixkaryana, Apalai, Bacairi, and Makusi. -from the Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue