Editor for this issue: <>
For those of you looking for Amorey Gethin's book *ANTILINGUISTICS*, here's some relevant information: It's a 1990 book, published by INTELLECT LIMITED, of Great Britain Suite 2 108/110 London Road Oxford OX3 9AW ISBN 1-871616-00-5. Sincerely, Stiv Fleishman Phil. Dept. Univ. of Maryland, College Park sf36Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueumail.umd.edu
There is a very good review of Gethin's ANTILINGUISTICS by Geoff Pullum in one of the 1991 issues of Computational Linguistics. I like Stephen Fleishman's suggestion that it could be that: > both the biological entities and > processes and the formal entities and processes are real, albeit that the > formal side is real and ideal? I would suggest that the various aspects of language: biological, mental, social, ..., and in my view Ideal too are complementary, rather than contradictory. After all, what is the motivation for attempting to promote one such aspect as more fundamental or important than the others? The social level of description seems inappropriate for describing the physics of speech production, though might be relevant to some kinds of phonetic variability which is unexplained by physical or psychological factors. Social constructs such as conversations, languages and promises don't reduce easily to psychology. And the limitless productivity of linguistic constructs such as centre-embedding doesn't fit well with a theory of language which doesn't admit Ideals. --- John ColemanMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
See Geoff Pullum's excoriating review in "Computational Linguistics" last year. (The June 91 issue, I think; sorry, I don't have it available to check.) The bottom line: Gethin doesn't have the faintest idea what he's talking about. \\\\ Graeme Hirst University of Toronto Computer Science Department //// ghMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuecs.utoronto.ca / gh
cs.toronto.edu / 416-978-8747
Thanks to Martin Haspelmath for bringing to my attention the new book on Endangered Languages, and for raising this very important issue. I agree that linguists should be trying to place this issue in the public eye. Here in Australia 200 years of white rule has reduced the number of Aboriginal languages from over 200 to around 50 at the moment - and quite a number of these are spoken only by old people. Complete extinction of these languages in the next couple of generations remains a distinct possibility, although Aboriginal people are now fighting back strongly themselves. Recent allocation of funds by the Auustralian Federal Government, and recognition of a network of Regional Aboriginal Language centres are sound moves which will help to reverse language shift although the amount of money allocated is very small and with some of the funds, the chances of them being being hijacked for other purposes (e.g. English teaching) are high. Haspelmath says "we can probably do nothing to stop the extinction of languages but we can do a lot to document the languages". While documentation is important I think this view is too pessimistic about the chances of reversing language shift. However we need to debate the best ways of achieving this, challenge conventional wisdoms about language maintenance, and exchange information about strategies that really work. I have a paper accepted for the Laval International Congress of Linguists on these issues, but I am uncertain of getting there because of funding problems. Because physically meeting together is often a problem for people in Australia because of isolation, both within the country, and from other countries, other kinds of networks should be set up. For a while I was editing a _Language Maintenance Newsletter_ as a forum mainly for Australian news, but including reports from overseas; this has unfortunately folded. I'd like to revive this or participate in the establishment of something similar. On the pattern of the network haspelmath describes for Europe, perhaps something could be set up for the Western Pacific. It could perhaps start on email and develop into a hardcopy newsletter if the capacity is there. Patrick McConvell, Anthropology, Northern Territory University, PO Box 40146, Casuarina, NT O811, AustraliaMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue