Editor for this issue: <>
The Chicago Tribune from last Sunday ran a piece by Alice Kahn of the San Francisco Chronicle about the use of ALL to introduce reported speech as in: So she's all, "For sure." And I'm all, "Wow." She quotes both George Lakoff and Geoff Nunberg and manages to edify linguistically while entertaining, so I bring the piece to LINGUIST subscribers' attention as an example of positive press on matters linguistic as well as a query into the use of ALL where we've come to expect LIKE. Neal R. Norrick tb0nrn1Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueniu.bitnet
Subscribers to Linguist might be interested in the following newspaper item in which the role of linguistics comes across clearly although not in a particularly comprehensible way. At least it makes a change from dialectology, and might make linguists appear to be doing something useful! ............ >From _the Guardian_ 21st March 1992: 'Language flaws' in document that led to hanging Police 'concocted Bentley statement' John Mullin Detectives concocted the statement which helped send Derek Bentley to the gallows for the murder of a police constable almost 40 years ago, according to new tests on the document. Up to four people put together the incriminating statement after the killing of PC Sidney Miles at a warehouse in Croydon in November 1952, language expert Andrew Morton said last night. Mr Bentley, aged 19 but with a mental age of 11, was under arrest when PC Miles was shot, but was hanged at Wandsworth Prison in London in January 1953. The prosecution argued successfully that he had known Christopher Craig, aged 16, had a gun when they had gone to raid the warehouse. Police claimed he shouted "Let him have it, Chris" before Mr Craig shot PC Miles. ... Mr Morton, a Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, uses a system of textual analysis distinct from other techniques like electro-static document analysis. He compared Mr Bentley's last letter to his mother and father, written 12 hours before he was executed, with the statement police said he made to them a few hours after the killing. ... Mr Morton said: "The statement simply cannot be accepted as Bentley's. There is no doubt that it is the work of more than one person, and possibly as many as four." The Court of Appeal last July freed Thomas McCrossen, serving 11 years for robbery, after Mr Morton said his tests indicated police had fabricated his confession. Mr Morton, whose statistical method plotting unusual deviations from an individual's normal language use, [sic] outlined his findings at Birmingham Unviersity where academics are meeting this weekend to discuss setting up an Institute of Forensic Linguistics. His findings on the Bentley statement back up those of Malcolm Coulthard, a senior lecturer in English at Birmingham University , who organised this weekend's meeting. Dr Coulthard said: "There are a number of interesting anomalies about the Bentley text which convince me the statement was the work of police officers. Adverbs like 'then', for example, appear immediately after the sentence subject - a clear indication of policespeak. Iris Bentley, aged 60, Mr Bentley's ssister, said last night: "The statement was full of words Derek wouldn't know how to use. What Mr Morton's work does is to back up what we have been saying for 40 years - the police made it up." ............ Mark Sebba Dept of Linguistics Lancaster UniversityMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Apologies for the error in my e-mail address that appeared in my last posting soliciting reviewers for RPh. For those who tried to contact me and had messages sent back, the correct addresses are: suzanneMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuegarnet.berkeley.edu suzanne
ucbgarne.bitnet Suzanne Fleischman