Editor for this issue: <>
There was one time when you could hardly find one linguistic article that did not contains several references to Chomsky in its bibliography, whether or not the author made any reference at all to him in the body of the article. I have a book somewhere entitled "The Generative Interpretation of Dialect" by I forgot whom. It has absolutely nothing to do with generative grammar: it is a diachronic phonology of Modern Greek dialects done along very traditional methods (and very good and interesting it is, too). The author decided on a title fashionable at the time that would catch the attention. Methinks those beside-the-point references were much akin to those you would find to Comrade Stalin's and Chairman Mao's thoughts in articles about growing bigger tomatoes or whether trimming you nose hairs was good or bad for your health (I kid you not, there was once an article on that very topic in the Renmin Ribao, in 1965 or thereabouts, and it did call upon Chairman Mao's thoughts and the principles of Makese-Lieningzhuyi to solve that terrible dilemma).Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
A *possible*, impressionistic and speculative explanation for the large number of Chomsky citations despite general ignorance of linguistic theory may be the following. First of all, citation is a peculiar human activity performed by a very small proportion of the population, mainly academics (?) Academics are strongly divided by disciplines. But Chomsky is cited by people in several disciplines (Linguistics, Psychology, Computer Science, Philosophy and of course Politics at least, sometimes Sociology ...). Which means that if more academics cite him at an equal rate to single-discipline citees, he will end up being cited proportionately more. --- John ColemanMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
A Mac concordance (beta-test version) was available (and, I think, still is) by anonymous FTP from clr.nmsu.edu by accessing /pub/tools/concordances/conc It comes with a longish manual and the program . H. KuceraMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
In response to L. Jake Jacobson's query regarding MacConcordance. I recall that it is available via FTP, but I do not recall just where. However, the question of where such a program is easy to answer, provided that one knows the filename (or a distinctive part of the name). Many members of this list will probably already know the network service called ARCHIE, but for those who don't: If you are searching for a particlar file (say MacConcordance.hqx) send a mail message to the nearest ARCHIE server. Canada ARCHIEMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueARCHIE.MCGILL.CA US ARCHIE
ARCHIE.SURA.NET ARCHIE
ARCHIE.ANS.NET ARCHIE
ARCHIE.UNL.EDU EUROPE ARCHIE
ARCHIE.FUNET.FI ARCHIE
ARCHIE.DOC.IC.AC.UK AUSTRALIA ARCHIE
ARCHIE.AU Use the following format in your message: PROG MacConcordance.hqx Wild cards are also available as well as a number of other functions. For brief instructions on how to use these functions, login to one of the ARCHIE servers with the username: archie and then type HELP. I trust that this will be of some help to LINGUIST list members. Michael Cheney Teologiska Institutionen Lunds Universitet Lund, Sverige + 46 46 10 47 52 Internet: Michael.cheney
teol.lu.se or Internet: cheney
gemini.ldc.lu.se EARN/Bitnet cheney
seldc52 Fax: +46 46 10 44 26