Editor for this issue: <>
Last year I sent out a request to the Linguist List asking the following... > I am doing some research into word sense disambiguation applied to > information retrieval. Recently I was reading a paper that said, > > "a number of researchers in text processing have observed that people can > consistently determine the sense of a word simply by examining the half > dozen or so words just before and after the word in focus." > > But then the paper doesn't seem to directly reference any papers mentioning > this. I would really like to track down these papers, does anyone have a > reference for them ? Someone has just contacted me asking for a summary of the answers. I guess I should've done this ages ago. Still, better late than never. I got many replies but not all that many references that were what I needed. Here are four references that are probably worth a look. The first two I've found and they are spot on. The others I havn't seen. Thanks to everyone who replied, it was a great help. Y. Choueka and S. Luisgnan, "Disambiguation by Short Contexts", "Computers and the Humanities", 19(3), pp147-157,1985 Miller, G. A., "Annual Review of Psychology", Communication, vol 5, pp401-420, 1954 (This contains a summary of work carried out by Abraham Kaplan) Graeme Hirst, "Semantic Interpretation and the resolution of Ambiguity", Studies in Natural Language Processing, Cambridge University Press, 1987, UK Kathleen Dahlgren: "Naive Semantics for Natural Language Understanding", Boston : Kluwer, 1988. +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | Mail : Mark Sanderson, Department of Computing Science, | | The University, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland, UK. | +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | E-mail : sandersoMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuedcs.glasgow.ac.uk | | Tel : +44 (0)41 339 8855 x6292 <---- ***New Number*** | | Fax : +44 (0)41 330 4913 | +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | "I'm gonna get you in my tent tent tent tent tent | | So we can both experiment ment ment ment ment" | +-----------------------------------------------------------+