Editor for this issue: <>
Dear members, My name is Allan Myrvang and I am a teacher of English in what is equivalent to the British grammar school. In Oelen - a small parish 60 kilometres to the east of the town of Haugesund which is located on the western coast of Norway. Since English is a difficult language with all its nuances and since we too seldom can afford to cross the Channel to visit you, I feel the need of asking you to help me on some difficult grammatical points. Hoping you will excuse me and be indulgent, I ask you to send the answers - should there be any - to my personal address, since my questions are of a rather elementary nature. Question 1: | lived John has | in Copenhagen for three years | been living What is the difference between the simple and progressive form of the verb? Do you in a deliberate way choose the simple form when the state is regarded as fairly permanent, whereas you save the expanded form for temporary states and limited durations? Or do you make no such distinc- tions? When using stance verbs, I mean. Likewise : waited I have for this moment for ten years been waiting Of course I know that the two instances given are not by any means completely parallel, but I feel there is something here.... Thanks in advance! Allan PS Do British speakers and American speakers regard the queation in the same way, I wonder.... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # Private address: Working place: # # Allan Myrvang OELEN Grammar School # # Sildegrend N -5580 OELEN # # N - 5590 ETNE Tel.:04 - 76 82 22 # # Norway Fax :04 - 76 70 41 # # Tel.:04 - 75 64 33 # # Internet <AmyrvangMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueOscar.BBB.No> # >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I am beginning research on the acquisition of grammatical gender in children, focusing on monolingual Spanish speakers and bilingual (Spanish/English) speakers. Does anyone have any references on this topic? I'd appreciate any help on this. Respond directly to me, and I will post a summary to the list if there is interest. Another query: does anyone have an E-mail address for Maria Estela Brisk, at Boston University? Thanks in advance. Elaine Miller Spanish Dept. UC-Santa Barbara 6500ermMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueucsbuxa.bitnet 6500erm
ucsbuxa.ucsb.edu
Pardon the neologism: lipogram = writing without using a designated letter, thus lipolalia would be the corresponding practice in speech. Compare the discussion of English-Prime of a few months ago. Martin Walker of the Manchester Guardian reports from Los Angeles about the youth gangs: "The Bloods, who never use a word beginning with the letter C of their rivals, the Cripps, who in turn never use a word beginning with B for Blood, are perhaps the best known." Urban myth, or linguistic data? Can anyone (dis)corroborate? ---- Lee Hartman, Southern Illinois UniversityMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I know that some time in the past (the 70's?) some linguists became
aware of the tendency to perpetuate sexist stereotypes in example
sentences ("John is a doctor"; "Mary is a nurse"), leading to the
use of gender-neutral names in examples (Kim, Sandy, Chris, etc.).
My question is: did anyone ever do (and maybe publish) a study
of this tendency in actual example sentences in linguistics textbooks
or articles?
Thanks.
Monica Macaulay
Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue