Editor for this issue: <>
Synaesthesia: A classic study is Brown, R. W., Leiter, R. A., & Hildum, D. C. (1957). Metaphors from music criticism. _Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology_, 54: 347-52. They found agreement among musically naive listeners in assigning "non-auditory sense terms" to recordings of sopranos, tenors, and baritones (e.g. cool, dry, thick, chromium, closed, coarse). Roger Brown gives the following interpretation (_Words and Things_, 1958, pp. 148-9): "The principal sensory dimensions of the world are the same for men everywhere and are named in all languages. Though each of these dimensions is primarily associated with one receptor system its essential quality is inter-sensory. The quality is first detected in one sense modality and is named at that stage. Afterward the quality is detected in many other phenomena that register with other senses. The original name tends to be extended to any experience manifesting the criterial quality. And so it happens that unrelated languagesx extend their vocabularies of sensation in similar fashion. So it happens, too, that people in one language community can identify the basic inter-sensory qualities in operatic voices and exttend their vocabularies accordingly." Dan Slobin (slobinMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuecogsci.berkeley.edu)
Stavros Macrakis wonders why I said that: ...the union of the set of even natural numbers with the set of primes which I happen to know is infinite although again not well-defined. The point is that the set of even natural numbers is an infinite set, and a well-defined one, but the the set of primes which I happen to know is not well-defined (because, for example, for some numbers I am not sure whether they are prime or not) but certainly is finite. The union of the two is, of course, infinite (because the even natural numbers are infinite) but is not well-defined (because the primes I know are not well-defined). I would submit that it is appropriate to think of NLs in this way, (i.e., discuss their mathematical properties such as finiteness vs. infinitude, (non)context-freeness, etc. even if they are not well-defined).Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue