Editor for this issue: <>
Jacques Guy writes: Finally, I found a meaning such that that sentence was grammatically correct, to me at least: "I think this [steak] is rarer than Allan does [cook them]". I think that this is not ellipsis, but rather an anaphoric use of does. "John does his veggie burgers rare." Where the 'does' is getting its interpretation from the context. Or perhaps 'does' is just a kind of underpecified lexical item here, a plausible idea in that it is usually just a tense marker. Eric SchillerMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
John Coleman seems to be out on his own in what he requires of phonological theories and proponents thereof. He is not. I agree wholeheartedly both with his observations concerning Natural Phonology and on his invitation to practitioners to demonstrate what they're claiming. Too much low grade observation and pre-theoretical formalisation has passed and still passes for 'phonology'. To some extent this can be seen in the way most 'theories' do indeed pick over the same old material. That's not to say that it's an illegitimate exercise (unless of course the picking over simply reworks some previous analysis without actually getting out there and listening/measuring to what happens!) rather that there is a concensus agenda which few practitioners are willing to challenge. I can find no evidence that Natural Phonologists have or are dealing with material which other frameworks have not essayed or find unaccountable. John LocalMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue