Editor for this issue: <>
Wynne Janis (Vol.3-559) asks for linguistic studies of narrator/character voice switches. I think the key work on this is 'Discourse in the Novel' by M.M.Bakhtin in THE DIALOGIC IMAGINATION, (ed. Michael Holquist), Austin, 1981. This is an original and groundbreaking study (preceded only by Volosinov in 'Marxism and the Philosophy of Language', in which Bakhtin had a hand.) Hirschkop and Shepherd, BAKHTIN AND CULTURAL THEORY, Manchester University Press, 1989 includes various discussions and an extensive critical bibliography. I don't really know about works using different methodologies, and I would be interested to hear about them. Martin Wynne Department of Linguistics and Phonetics University of LeedsMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
bert peeters <peetersMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuetasman.cc.utas.edu.au> says in 3.559 that a physicist friend claims that physics is culture-neutral. Peeters continues: I'm trying to tell him he is wrong.... could anyone come up with languages where there is no concept for the (physical) concept of "force"? The linguistic argument won't get very far, since words such as `mass', `force', `field', `energy' are technical and do not have anything like their everyday meaning. (In fact, there were several counter-culture-type books some years ago (e.g. The Dancing Wu Li Masters) which claimed that Chinese philosophy foreshadows quantum mechanics, and that the Chinese language is more appropriate for it; bunkum according to all my physicist friends (including Chinese ones).) Now to what extent is the modern understanding of physics dependent on Western world-view? A vast question, but how do you answer it? For that matter, how do you define physics in a culture-neutral way? Do you accept the experimental method? etc. Anyway, I suspect you can't make much headway on this from a linguistic point of view. Perhaps the philosophers of science have something interesting to say? -s