Editor for this issue: <>
John.M.LawlerMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueum.cc.umich.edu provides valuable comments on the information that should be present in an electronic citation (such as to Linguist). I'd like to add some comments about the form of such citations: Suffixing ".internet" to internet addresses is a bad idea, since there is a very real sense in which RFC 822 domain addresses are a standard; worse yet, the suffix syntactically conforms to the standard but won't work (because there is no top level .internet domain). Since as far as I know all of the other networks are proprietary or national, we would do well to restrict ourselves to internet and/or X.400 addressing - which by now is usable information for almost eveyone anyway. That said, the official convention for embedding 822 addresses in text fields is to surround them in ASCII angle brackets, and it avoids both syntactic and semantic confusion to adopt this convention elsewhere. (It has the added benefit that if the copy is machine readable the address can be used directly, without further editing). In addition, it is essential to note the mode of access of an archive (in this case ascii-mode anonymous ftp) and to give people enough information to locate the "publisher" - which in this case is presumably NOT Anthony's and Helen's email addresses, but the linguist-request address (Journal editors are not usually cited, but approximate addresses of obscure publishers are). So here's my version: Christine Kamprath <LIFY460
orange.cc.utexas.edu>. "Re: 3.562 Accents: LINGUIST in the news". In Linguist List 3.575 (July 1992) <linguist
tamvm1.tamu.edu>. Archive ftp (ascii) anonymous
linguistics.archive.umich.edu: linguistics/linguist.list/volume.3/no.551-600 . (Note that I've inserted a space between the filename and the trailing period. Since the '.' character is legal at the end of a Unix filename, this distinction too is essential). stephen p spackman spackman
dfki.uni-sb.de _________________________ [Moderators' note: This seems like a very sensible format to us. In fact, we're thinking of adding the Lawler/Spackman citation form (as above) to the LINGUIST "How-To's". However, we'll wait a bit to see if other worthwhile suggestions grow out of this discussion. -Helen & Anthony]