Editor for this issue: <>
RE: Case assignment in Kannada The Portuguese infinitive takes nominative case subjects, but it can also take agreement! Take a look at 'A Grammar of Portuguese Infinitives' by Mario Perini, UT-Austin PhD diss. 1974. These infinitives have suffered much scrutiny and you should be able to find more recent work. Antonio Carlos Quicoli, if you can contact him, could probably find a GB justification.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
David Pesetsky (pesetskMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueAthena.MIT.EDU) writes: > > HASPELMATH
philologie.fu-berlin.dbp.de writes: > > "A language I am working on, Lezgian (Nakho-Daghestanian), also shows > Nominative case in non-finite clauses, e.g. > > (2) Didedi-z gada-0 agaq'-na k'an-zawa. 'Mother wants the boy to arrive.' > mother-DAT boy-NOM arr.-NONFIN want-PRES" Let me add the Bulgarian counterpart: Tja iska toj da pristigne. `She wants him to arrive.' she-NOM want-Pres3Sg he-NOM to arrive-Pres3Sg where _da_ is a de-finitising particle. (There is no infinitive.) I'm using pronouns, because nouns in Bulgarian don't decline. > However, what > makes it clear that the nominative here is in the lower clause, as > opposed to the higher? It is my impression that in most Daghestanian languages the main verb in DAT/NOM constructions agrees in class and number with the NOM argument. If the nominative is in the higher clause, the form of the matrix verb should reflect that. > DAT/NOM configurations with 'want' are common (e.g. Russian), But not in control constructions. Ivan A Derzhanski